Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14829

Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve

From Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve
Date 2023-01-16 23:50 +0100
Message-ID <FOGsF-Uy9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <F2GbE-5Hg4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <F2GY1-5HKU-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <F2XPb-5RU0-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Octobus

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi, I just made a new version of the mercurial-evolve package, following 
the new upstream 10.5.3. It's still at 
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/mercurial-evolve.

Andrej, would you be so kind to take a look at it, I hope the package 
can make it before the freeze.

On the technical side, this new upsteam version provides compatibility 
with Mercurial 6.3 (which I see has come up since last attempt) and 
Python 3.11, according to the changelog, I didn't follow details myself.

I believe I had formerly addressed the ftpmaster reservations about the 
copyright statements, but feel free to tell me if there is something 
else to be done.

Best,

On 9/7/22 09:12, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2022, at 14:53, Andrej Shadura wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Sep 2022, at 14:45, Georges Racinet wrote:
>>> I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "mercurial-evolve".
>>> (Cc-ing DDs I've spoken about it in the past)
>> Cool. I'm a little bit busy right now packing for the trip, but I will
>> have a look at it a bit later this afternoon.
> I’ve made some changes and uploaded evolve to NEW.
> In one commit I made a "typo" and wrote a wrong word: "Drop unnecessary variable names". What I meant was, of course, "variables" :)
> Anyway, DH_VERBOSE=1 is better set by the maintainer rather than directly in debian/rules, as it’s a bit too verbose, and this package is not too tricky to require it at all times. I can’t remember right now how exactly PYBUILD_NAME works, but I don’t think you were using it correctly here, and it didn’t make any visible difference anyway (likely because there’s only one binary package), so I dropped it.
>
> Other than that, the rest of the commits are minor nitpicks and are, hopefully, self-descriptive.
>
> Thanks, you did a good job on your first Debian package :)
>

-- 
Georges Racinet
https://octobus.net, https://about.heptapod.host, https://heptapod.net
GPG: BF5456F4DC625443849B6E58EE20CA44EF691D39, sur serveurs publics

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2022-09-06 14:50 +0200
  Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve "Andrej Shadura" <andrewsh@debian.org> - 2022-09-06 15:40 +0200
    Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve "Andrej Shadura" <andrewsh@debian.org> - 2022-09-07 09:40 +0200
      Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2022-09-07 11:50 +0200
        Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2022-09-07 18:50 +0200
      Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2022-09-07 18:30 +0200
      Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2023-01-16 23:50 +0100
        Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve "Andrej Shadura" <andrewsh@debian.org> - 2023-02-06 10:50 +0100
          Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2023-02-06 12:10 +0100
          Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2023-02-06 12:10 +0100

csiph-web