Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14829
| From | Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve |
| Date | 2023-01-16 23:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FOGsF-Uy9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <F2GbE-5Hg4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <F2GY1-5HKU-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <F2XPb-5RU0-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Octobus |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi, I just made a new version of the mercurial-evolve package, following the new upstream 10.5.3. It's still at https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/mercurial-evolve. Andrej, would you be so kind to take a look at it, I hope the package can make it before the freeze. On the technical side, this new upsteam version provides compatibility with Mercurial 6.3 (which I see has come up since last attempt) and Python 3.11, according to the changelog, I didn't follow details myself. I believe I had formerly addressed the ftpmaster reservations about the copyright statements, but feel free to tell me if there is something else to be done. Best, On 9/7/22 09:12, Andrej Shadura wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 6 Sep 2022, at 14:53, Andrej Shadura wrote: >> On Tue, 6 Sep 2022, at 14:45, Georges Racinet wrote: >>> I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "mercurial-evolve". >>> (Cc-ing DDs I've spoken about it in the past) >> Cool. I'm a little bit busy right now packing for the trip, but I will >> have a look at it a bit later this afternoon. > I’ve made some changes and uploaded evolve to NEW. > In one commit I made a "typo" and wrote a wrong word: "Drop unnecessary variable names". What I meant was, of course, "variables" :) > Anyway, DH_VERBOSE=1 is better set by the maintainer rather than directly in debian/rules, as it’s a bit too verbose, and this package is not too tricky to require it at all times. I can’t remember right now how exactly PYBUILD_NAME works, but I don’t think you were using it correctly here, and it didn’t make any visible difference anyway (likely because there’s only one binary package), so I dropped it. > > Other than that, the rest of the commits are minor nitpicks and are, hopefully, self-descriptive. > > Thanks, you did a good job on your first Debian package :) > -- Georges Racinet https://octobus.net, https://about.heptapod.host, https://heptapod.net GPG: BF5456F4DC625443849B6E58EE20CA44EF691D39, sur serveurs publics
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2022-09-06 14:50 +0200
Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve "Andrej Shadura" <andrewsh@debian.org> - 2022-09-06 15:40 +0200
Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve "Andrej Shadura" <andrewsh@debian.org> - 2022-09-07 09:40 +0200
Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2022-09-07 11:50 +0200
Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2022-09-07 18:50 +0200
Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2022-09-07 18:30 +0200
Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2023-01-16 23:50 +0100
Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve "Andrej Shadura" <andrewsh@debian.org> - 2023-02-06 10:50 +0100
Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2023-02-06 12:10 +0100
Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2023-02-06 12:10 +0100
csiph-web