Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12504

Re: [Python-modules-team] python-xlib_0.26-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Andrej Shadura <andrewsh@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: [Python-modules-team] python-xlib_0.26-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Date	Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:30:01 +0200
Message-ID	<zYDwZ-7dS-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<zYvpL-2gq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <zYvpM-2gq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <zYvpM-2gq-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <zYvpM-2gq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <zYvpL-2gq-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Apr 23 06:27:09 2020
Old-Return-Path	<andrewsh@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.201 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -3.5
X-Greylist	delayed 2298 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 06:11:20 UTC
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=debian1.andrewsh.user; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:To: Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Sender: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=xYZd2EfAKpc++8x0BXMtw8lnjA0bvFm6SfEoJW1Aii0=; b=tkPgrYijK0PqEa6FvcyS0iFOrN C5RIJi+TUvTeiO0kdibxyGFmVM1gzQcXwxMoinCjyAYbVKskAZN5ZyXiMcYcQcmKhC6uQwYSkxGkp MbW3WiSOoBQ07+Mxm5Ecg8u6caAfSaoqny1TaaHsexEE/r5r76R26epR6qptjEBsyM/Q=;
X-Gm-Message-State	AGi0Pua5QmHYUrzD5/b49M5IEtxZc1D0SZ99cK0UaUzlddxHZ3jT4g7r Y7aGtBvEbqFS/zCY7gtbpx/3xoIoLUnCauglzmc=
X-Google-SMTP-Source	APiQypKwCl/NtXln1YamAy1abFuPMpYCzh9lS0u2le/spqadUDIjRh8jMRZdgrHwur2jdiTeEo/uzrhEfSbtI7aFg9k=
X-Received	by 2002:a17:907:1185:: with SMTP id uz5mr1323273ejb.335.1587619977967; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID	<CACujMDO6JR2VGN_wQxMnr_Z3RY=qkvj_EFhRQpXw9PLDh9A5Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18186
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CACujMDO6JR2VGN_wQxMnr_Z3RY=qkvj_EFhRQpXw9PLDh9A5Sw@mail.gmail.com
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	45
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date	Thu, 23 Apr 2020 07:32:45 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<CACujMDO6JR2VGN_wQxMnr_Z3RY=qkvj_EFhRQpXw9PLDh9A5Sw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References	<E1j8pfQ-0007al-CI@fasolo.debian.org> <CAB4XWXx3mHibOqyh1dRYOkLSsFB6qD9UZ4B5Ezpac1gMNxfYbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACujMDOVggumZZn6twYs26_GBY3m3jpWGVqwtH+SmzN07tqtjA@mail.gmail.com> <11084106.tpzv5O842r@l5580> <CAB4XWXxodUbQQiJxjk=ch=S2K4wXDRi00742pwuTMVjfhf8khA@mail.gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:12504

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 23:44, Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> wrote:
> Andrej,
> can you please clarify why you're keep using pristine-lfs even when
> prompted not to? this is just from 2 packages uploaded in the last
> hour (ftr, pyopenssl is broken now..)

Sandro, wasn’t it all about pristine-tar missing? You (and others) use
pristine-tar, you need pristine-tar data. I don’t like it and don’t
use it, but okay, I don’t want you to get annoyed by the inability to
follow your workflow, I try and use pristine-tar every time. But
what’s wrong with also publishing a pristine-lfs branch? It doesn’t
prevent you in any way from doing things the way you were doing
before.

I will look at what happened with pyopenssl.

> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/pyopenssl/-/tree/pristine-lfs
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/urwid/-/tree/pristine-lfs

> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:31 PM Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> wrote:
> > The way to get the policy changed is not to ignore it and then get aggressive
> > when called on it.

Scott, I didn’t get aggressive, or, at least, it was not my intention.
I’m sorry if it came across as such. I genuinely believe that
pristine-tar should be gradually moved away from to something better,
as I had a misfortune to work with it on a large scale (hundreds of
packages) and I know how unreliable it sometimes is. Not only it
routinely generated tarballs with different checksums, it sometimes
failed to generate anything at all. I developed pristine-lfs as a
proper tool with the UI compatible with pristine-tar (instead of just
a custom script) specifically to help others use it without changing
workflows much.

-- 
Cheers,
  Andrej

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [Python-modules-team] python-xlib_0.26-1_source.changes ACCEPTED  into unstable Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2020-04-22 23:50 +0200
  Re: [Python-modules-team] python-xlib_0.26-1_source.changes ACCEPTED  into unstable Andrej Shadura <andrewsh@debian.org> - 2020-04-23 08:30 +0200

csiph-web