Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12504
| From | Andrej Shadura <andrewsh@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: [Python-modules-team] python-xlib_0.26-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable |
| Date | 2020-04-23 08:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zYDwZ-7dS-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <zYvpL-2gq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <zYvpM-2gq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <zYvpM-2gq-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <zYvpM-2gq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <zYvpL-2gq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 23:44, Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> wrote: > Andrej, > can you please clarify why you're keep using pristine-lfs even when > prompted not to? this is just from 2 packages uploaded in the last > hour (ftr, pyopenssl is broken now..) Sandro, wasn’t it all about pristine-tar missing? You (and others) use pristine-tar, you need pristine-tar data. I don’t like it and don’t use it, but okay, I don’t want you to get annoyed by the inability to follow your workflow, I try and use pristine-tar every time. But what’s wrong with also publishing a pristine-lfs branch? It doesn’t prevent you in any way from doing things the way you were doing before. I will look at what happened with pyopenssl. > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/pyopenssl/-/tree/pristine-lfs > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/urwid/-/tree/pristine-lfs > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:31 PM Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> wrote: > > The way to get the policy changed is not to ignore it and then get aggressive > > when called on it. Scott, I didn’t get aggressive, or, at least, it was not my intention. I’m sorry if it came across as such. I genuinely believe that pristine-tar should be gradually moved away from to something better, as I had a misfortune to work with it on a large scale (hundreds of packages) and I know how unreliable it sometimes is. Not only it routinely generated tarballs with different checksums, it sometimes failed to generate anything at all. I developed pristine-lfs as a proper tool with the UI compatible with pristine-tar (instead of just a custom script) specifically to help others use it without changing workflows much. -- Cheers, Andrej
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [Python-modules-team] python-xlib_0.26-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2020-04-22 23:50 +0200 Re: [Python-modules-team] python-xlib_0.26-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Andrej Shadura <andrewsh@debian.org> - 2020-04-23 08:30 +0200
csiph-web