Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11945

Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal?

Path	csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	"Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal?
Date	Sat, 26 Oct 2019 20:30:02 +0200
Message-ID	<yVyZ4-1Sa-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<yHtZg-4xG-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Oct 26 18:24:18 2019
Old-Return-Path	<rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.199 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -5.5
Arc-Seal	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1572113220; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=Esj3pjWxyaK895mfkWM9N/9PqTn9CK4WeuI7a8NGoMGYVW5IgWYKk5hUD55X4JC7jAIpBCXYUcNefwjIGK+2DXYHDO5YNjVGDdGEjyJq9u82PpIFBADgFpaYYTk28cXReepD53abs6C2R2AsPcbJ8WMcrxke0iHg8cxphsNIKlU=
Arc-Message-Signature	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1572113220; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=ppmOC0KmDuLxCVE9DdfhCkFrh5lprX9s4vIvgbL5K8Q=; b=kuTpPLq8ty34uysHBVwk4CE6zwHhfByrmhfSUOQrDAkTfgBK1XHbAFYLc2A+jdfsu6yvHuNQhFFV0iTkkdeUkUNecEUQ9i2tpJn4FTsNi0iv/vrWypaeFib8DfR84G2gaXuOZrYvvQ621DdwPBIZ+3UMAAVaD9HndTgzYmtr5mQ=
Arc-Authentication-Results	i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=zoho.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rebecca_palmer@zoho.com; dmarc=pass header.from=<rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> header.from=<rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
Domainkey-Signature	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=zapps768; d=zoho.com; h=subject:from:to:references:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; b=iSMsj1QX3Vtt6qAJN0yeft1JmeyPE3SiOkJruYOA4trGiahFpL/M8Y4Dne6azzv7R1eRyXgd/v7S xa+a+1uAJl+lvGA26CyjH23a25T3eG59bgYswthSn7uL7pWNeRfP
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1572113220; s=zm2019; d=zoho.com; i=rebecca_palmer@zoho.com; h=Subject:From:To:References:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; l=488; bh=ppmOC0KmDuLxCVE9DdfhCkFrh5lprX9s4vIvgbL5K8Q=; b=BGxHJzuyo6q/YEfnQfJUa/tB4f+7IiL+0rvjcu5V4NoRzBZCLA7kQiaFIakZLYLp NvlXhFey7piBBt3Lq4f/vOOzR4UHvSDBqx1K9VZ34/4fExtXOkhCKGwyIKwqrRaIOvP x4KeDeDSZbK+VSf5jo3hVFcF53hXmNmqN9CbaOHI=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language	en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Zohomailclient	External
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/17506
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/328c2da9-e741-3c3b-fa29-6ef93d8b55cf@zoho.com
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	13
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Sat, 26 Oct 2019 19:06:49 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<328c2da9-e741-3c3b-fa29-6ef93d8b55cf@zoho.com>
X-Original-References	<f280eff4-4ed2-ab52-c917-1292b1e5dad2@zoho.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11945

Show key headers only | View raw

This had a bug: packages with source name = binary name don't have a 
Source: field in the binary Packages file, which makes grep-dctrl skip 
them when asked to output the Source field.

Fixed version:

grep-dctrl -w -F Pre-Depends,Depends,Recommends -s Package 
"python-$module" 
/var/lib/apt/lists/*_debian_dists_sid_main_binary-amd64_Packages ; 
grep-dctrl -w -s Package "python-$module" 
/var/lib/apt/lists/*_debian_dists_sid_main_source_Sources

I have updated the wiki page.

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2019-09-15 01:20 +0200
  Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk> - 2019-09-15 11:10 +0200
    Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2019-09-15 14:30 +0200
      Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk> - 2019-09-15 17:40 +0200
      Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still  a thing? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2019-09-16 00:40 +0200
        Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still  a thing? Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2019-09-16 09:20 +0200
          A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-09-18 00:20 +0200
            Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2019-09-18 19:40 +0200
            Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-10-26 20:30 +0200

csiph-web