Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11835

Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal?

Path csiph.com!4.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal?
Date Wed, 18 Sep 2019 19:40:01 +0200
Message-ID <yHM5P-8qI-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <yHtZg-4xG-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Sep 18 17:39:03 2019
Old-Return-Path <diane@ghic.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-6.363 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_FROM_MX=-3.1; rate: -4.6
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent Evolution 3.30.5-1.1
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/17374
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1b31b48681b6f8ed2386e09fbb3ee23f712557e0.camel@ghic.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 14
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:38:47 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID <1b31b48681b6f8ed2386e09fbb3ee23f712557e0.camel@ghic.org>
X-Original-References <f280eff4-4ed2-ab52-c917-1292b1e5dad2@zoho.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11835

Show key headers only | View raw



On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 22:46 +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> grep-dctrl -w -F Depends,Recommends -s Source "python-$module" 
> /var/lib/apt/lists/*_debian_dists_sid_main_binary-amd64_Packages ; 
> grep-dctrl -w -s Package "python-$module" 
> /var/lib/apt/lists/*_debian_dists_sid_main_source_Sources

Thank you that does look more thorough.

I added a lightly edited version of your recommendation to the
Python/2Removal page. (So I can find it again next time I need it)

https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2019-09-15 01:20 +0200
  Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk> - 2019-09-15 11:10 +0200
    Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2019-09-15 14:30 +0200
      Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk> - 2019-09-15 17:40 +0200
      Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still  a thing? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2019-09-16 00:40 +0200
        Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still  a thing? Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2019-09-16 09:20 +0200
          A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-09-18 00:20 +0200
            Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2019-09-18 19:40 +0200
            Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-10-26 20:30 +0200

csiph-web