Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11812

Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing?

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing?
Date Sun, 15 Sep 2019 11:10:02 +0200
Message-ID <yGyHE-7sE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <yGpuF-13N-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <yGpuF-13N-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org,Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Sep 15 09:09:08 2019
Old-Return-Path <jelmer@jelmer.uk>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.1 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -4.6
X-Greylist delayed 374 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 08:52:10 UTC
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=jelmer.uk; s=default; t=1568537153; bh=uziJ+lPDLgaHe5dGn01U4vDMfxhD7TvqfVK/fuvyS3M=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:From; b=lIKAwqiVzpbmEf/UCyKkCPuLGSDdQX5Mcn3M0CpA3yOc0s118eic6Fg8oJBYRffIM WlVyMwq0CyS/4/6Iz5AFaDMwCCOLlu96NgyqOFOkruMLcGBOcyHW6uBuibR26M32sr qbIFzA5u0ku/JUJ3QKwuGTxS3v//nDCU8L7/FIj0=
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
Autocrypt addr=jelmer@jelmer.uk; keydata= mQGNBFw4CgUBDADqWVCPPb7oOxSr0L0iuFWJx4xp/t+Mk8vg+QNDfuWPfGpkmsG6+ssDtLDALXcz vwlmSb/kBHLpb+gyWpZH/90xOZKx8/CjluMpxqEEsXUqnnShLegFfQA1Cs8oI3OEWAxnJSc4om05 xYJnIJXHGG2ZDbUgN2KF3vCeoMo0+A8tOOd28vR5Uws4ugxRq2MlXOk44Xfubj5eaA+TDl3FGGuy N3xZM/JR4l18DYydUbI/FIOWL30ZuXiJbnA6PclUaIEqrzY77ph37XSgw4lVF+OIjYb3O/nBZFBb HdLWF7bZxP4ghC1wgCWvGQ4/fd7NoFhl9wJ9Qhs7rm3HSc2P7JDup+UMKbzwGA1zUmafzGHW/5Kq cOL8V2dUAb/7aE5Oaeu/OkVAvRgI4WaHpBn/XskYKV3qhBc0Yt33BG148BiS8V0eEhVjK/fprrU+ K71Tk9Ffk+EKg1EHB/E5FXBchumAiXTk7nKM1JYdFqw607hCvQQFcPC8mYoKp07Stbg/A+EAEQEA AbQQamVsbWVyQGplbG1lci51a4kBsAQTAQoAGgQLCQgHAhUKAhYBAhkABYJcOAoFAp4BApsDAAoJ EEo3JaKm8W3SGWsMAJvwX96NN3umQXHOHrzEesGHHnQaqRpYQbc8lRVi7KuYBHS9Xiy3ByCix22F YMA4rPo8QY01FCs/gM66flL5CC8Jp5d4wCDVjrXTadW5VSVPv3if0hwfkvkh3ISkq2Y+pU4CTbsh cun7SSspRYhVhr/+BIgag7CbTGbSIevDopWu0cVQEUaiN+3xT6In5jMCq11h/UTHlitUK6Ut4DGP 0wSxWLSBLkDSpXl6s9O6DK4ZU3LYrA0OouLlLLUvLhkWICthe+m3UGfbsfNM483N/5oBPRyier+p PGWPakNFdA+GT8WUcpnOqQDSI04cjvYX1L1ZoWTW5cK4zsXs7VAc/B/yyjrCw9PhJNze3+AlXPIg 2sw3R5qcFAkwXebpxmB3vPvjJKJNEHmJbSXkm921k9LdeqsbmzNPZGFcccckg8VZSZDEa9nEluW4 1JwHlYtuCMuu/2eoqp6efZ9wjG6WOhbOmo4VKMSuSGu9eK/gns/HHy9p225+DysR5oOAiG1DZLkB jQRcOAoFAQwA2Ipu1qvuY+3A0PozSONNZB5VD1Bm/ZDnFce9scmSr7xh3phzw0iiqJ0bj2Ia7f4r 4An0ld5ENdJurIokZloJV92891QsV0pao13jngOaWZI2Iyv+fA91lRJA2Q4GVAsqKF1hLAO9Yth4 lf/yMlBKyFSV/PR8vRw7za030VW0nVYKwqEL1N1Cvzt6PmofSepV2CCC6LvfbtfA+lTr4tZ4k4lN EJLGx9deSH3Ph4gu4DU0Vo7rk1GS2MlEMYgi8IwYPlDTYie2sklq+JWLqO4PaVi0H49xWbPNuwFS V5xk9IeisKMWkmu+0Elxo+k6nCiXr93phbt2hjkQ7Dg9VMp9N+fJpHjvzhGbZ07smVdzlVcDcEOV fpNalXxvjGZ+cb08YSBFvx8t18W3YXLQFy7D4c6T7/9R3x0eni/Gs2v6Al976BnjB65t6ETGFGdF aImHRAHQhk7Gj2EL5z9m9l8LjKjpBSEPixgm/fLaj6MInRPUkgWMBM5t6T3J2e6zzLRXABEBAAGJ AZ8EGAEKAAkFglw4CgUCmwwACgkQSjcloqbxbdLf2Av+Nw0192Orzx64Rvycc6WHavy/tzC2DMP6 j/63EWhjkZJ1LruBj5rP5Tt0M/7GQ75RQOj7RZdRS6kb2hW4jQYnirWuHiXj07Y/611HpoPYTog+ heYcPT67A2QkuOQJ3bk/c9MzOg+LFWRyztgoMYrmH+00UgA8IcfEhvuqKZLyD3sLHPniuivyDrP4 ojw22aj/Tj0NnXhdVEZmThwsY0fSZv1ZOSJ0JDxIjk3KtbM1sn2e8IvYNZkux5hoVnsmrU75KBFx 1/3DB+JpJY0u9O3XugRsSWAqmP6MTmTYwm7djeVGRtpcksLsVDBotk5C7OROuAS5YrwTohE75AtM d6iuA2rGXS5dTEs/noHoFrVwvnIXncPV7hMEj9Teeb6/4lZiF9kaMNSUDMqPt+tFdSVuhD5ldEhL KtgyWKu6sFJ5uoN4qJfj6r3b1mvPMl22NmCoNFfGR+DDh0NqLFaHJGghHKqGOgdA7ul70GzSqYRr IsiYf4k4F5qzy+LdykGp1CTM
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/17345
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/DA3FA0BE-A4C8-41FF-9533-815FBE228603@jelmer.uk
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 64
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:45:44 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <DA3FA0BE-A4C8-41FF-9533-815FBE228603@jelmer.uk>
X-Original-References <5c8da6a2-309d-d8d8-e773-172a50b6e56e@debian.org> <2926378.PZRHtU5IR0@l5580>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11812

Show key headers only | View raw



On 15 September 2019 01:15:11 CEST, Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> wrote:
>On Saturday, September 14, 2019 6:43:13 PM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> As I wrongly thought python-extras was used only by OpenStack stuff,
>I
>> removed Python 2 support for it. Then someone filed a bug against
>> python-testtools (ScottK, I believe) saying that it became RC.
>> Therefore, I went ahead and removed Python 2 support for testtools,
>but
>> now, this implies that a few packages which I didn't wish to impact
>are
>> also RC:
>> 
>> * bzr-builddeb
>> * bzr-email
>> * bzr-fastimport
>> * bzr-git
>> * bzr-stats
>> * bzr-upload
>> * loggerhead
>> 
>> So, basically, unfortunately, Bazaar has lost some of its build
>> dependencies.
>> 
>> So, I went ahead, and looked what I could do for Bazaar.
>Unfortunately,
>> when looking at:
>> https://launchpad.net/bzr
>> 
>> I can see no release since January 2016, no daily archive. The last
>> commit in the bzr repository of bzr is from 2017-03-17.
>> 
>> Then I went to see how much Python 3 effort would be needed, and I
>> quickly gave up. It'd be A LOT of work, but nobody seems doing ANY
>work
>> on bzr anymore.
>> 
>> So I wonder: is it time to remove bazaar from Debian? Or is there any
>> vague plan to make it work with Python 3? If we are to remove it from
>> Debian, then we'd better do it ASAP.
>
>As I understand it, bazaar (bzr) is dead and being replaced by breezy
>(brz), 
>which is python3 compatible.
>
>https://www.breezy-vcs.org/
>
>My inference is that anything bzr specific can go, but I'm not involved
>in 
>either project.

Bzr maintainer / breezy upstream here.

I'm planning to upload transitional packages to trigger upgrades from bzr to Breezy.

The packages for that are not ready yet though. Can we undo the dropping of python-testtools in the meantime? 

Jelmer

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2019-09-15 01:20 +0200
  Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk> - 2019-09-15 11:10 +0200
    Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2019-09-15 14:30 +0200
      Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk> - 2019-09-15 17:40 +0200
      Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still  a thing? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2019-09-16 00:40 +0200
        Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still  a thing? Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2019-09-16 09:20 +0200
          A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-09-18 00:20 +0200
            Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2019-09-18 19:40 +0200
            Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-10-26 20:30 +0200

csiph-web