Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11821
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? |
| Date | Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:20:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yGTsJ-4Uw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <yGpuF-13N-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <yGpuF-13N-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <yGyHE-7sE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <yGBPb-10n-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <yGLlv-7Ax-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <yGLlv-7Ax-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Sep 16 07:16:27 2019 |
| Old-Return-Path | <wrar@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-12 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -3.5 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wrar.name; s=20160710; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date: Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=8p8gd8XMO5GUcWP/m48QuCg29ANydq0fLCBuBJKYjy0=; b=Mt+MH76218spk8GtlRsCqtl5P /6zcHWGJCBejvk5OLYBlCcQMPagtX3jI3vBiLC8j+IQ+iB3oGfRPalOHg840uHRVpxVpItMcrOA6V ikFmSkfOAnaQx1igR+ZJpRFiVJrjs9EzttUl1EQG9xB6o5k1xsmg/kKfk877Vm5EUPTUY=; |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3D7yMlnunRPwJqC7" |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| User-Agent | Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/17357 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20190916071613.GL1706@belkar.wrar.name |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 36 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:16:13 +0500 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <20190916071613.GL1706@belkar.wrar.name> |
| X-Original-References | <5c8da6a2-309d-d8d8-e773-172a50b6e56e@debian.org> <2926378.PZRHtU5IR0@l5580> <DA3FA0BE-A4C8-41FF-9533-815FBE228603@jelmer.uk> <CAHKYmeuEkCGjdU5XvOxdfQa9h+KPwdEgQD5C8UrzfZY9gvTUUg@mail.gmail.com> <2307d9b7-6010-04d8-ec10-f35dd81e70ea@debian.org> <20190915223122.GA19321@espresso.pseudorandom.co.uk> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11821 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Note that dak doesn't check autopkgtest deps. I'm using grep-dctrl -FTestsuite-triggers $pkg -sPackage /var/lib/apt/lists/deb.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_source_Sources for that. -- WBR, wRAR
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2019-09-15 01:20 +0200
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk> - 2019-09-15 11:10 +0200
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2019-09-15 14:30 +0200
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk> - 2019-09-15 17:40 +0200
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2019-09-16 00:40 +0200
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2019-09-16 09:20 +0200
A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-09-18 00:20 +0200
Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2019-09-18 19:40 +0200
Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-10-26 20:30 +0200
csiph-web