Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11813
| Path | csiph.com!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? |
| Date | Sun, 15 Sep 2019 14:30:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yGBPb-10n-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <yGpuF-13N-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <yGpuF-13N-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <yGyHE-7sE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Sep 15 12:27:05 2019 |
| Old-Return-Path | <mapreri@gmail.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-4.633 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.015, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: .mail-ot1-f45.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5 |
| X-Google-Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9dDfPCOStLYt0zHtAM3OX+5OvwzIp2Lurj2hZNHqGLA=; b=rgefbn5RTzCgG3ekfxLxGb4MZpSvuq3PFK3W7b02GS15fWhmNvU63c0TIPe+D1agZ0 oxh7xo54kWzkfeJut7Cjo9gWCtJBl8Fnvt4ErraoqfdQLzCiyIU4Zrjg520TUchvlqbA 4wi5Zi5y3Ue5QKMYEHGHKWEt5U+dOoTmEgFmenWLp3OfIomuS/08fhdm7cWxHYl3JPnO /57arfDbF4x0RqyqjOBMjtKX166MI7gsqcS0bTdVkPbPdnHY7Qwb8Fi1wmn3nQSuNGJt oNMeQt6hiOoZyPVkAudedavdK8bHkRTqTGva/Eo+3uvtUmhv6bHpfOnlR8FDT0/LX351 S1EQ== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | APjAAAXgL/Dk1cvBP9n7DZX+gVw9jhJdQCvEZVhMmDoYcsoO8hgNDBvx yjmbS1Q3qBDtAiZjXKbubWKOtFE7CqA= |
| X-Google-SMTP-Source | APXvYqzirhI3cM10Yir/0+R9X+9pUnK8Df2dov5mdp6g7PbA++ggPTwKx0s3t4eQPKPX0JV8ziouew== |
| X-Received | by 2002:a9d:6952:: with SMTP id p18mr7960268oto.217.1568550408875; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 05:26:48 -0700 (PDT) |
| X-Received | by 2002:aca:d846:: with SMTP id p67mr8979606oig.144.1568550407731; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 05:26:47 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID | <CAHKYmeuEkCGjdU5XvOxdfQa9h+KPwdEgQD5C8UrzfZY9gvTUUg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content-Type | multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dd824505929699c3" |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/17346 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAHKYmeuEkCGjdU5XvOxdfQa9h+KPwdEgQD5C8UrzfZY9gvTUUg@mail.gmail.com |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 178 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>, Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
| X-Original-Date | Sun, 15 Sep 2019 14:26:35 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <CAHKYmeuEkCGjdU5XvOxdfQa9h+KPwdEgQD5C8UrzfZY9gvTUUg@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Original-References | <5c8da6a2-309d-d8d8-e773-172a50b6e56e@debian.org> <2926378.PZRHtU5IR0@l5580> <DA3FA0BE-A4C8-41FF-9533-815FBE228603@jelmer.uk> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11813 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Considering that this is bzr we are talking about, a package that is already entering the graveyard, I think it would be easiest to just disable the test suite and move on. But I would be happier it Thomas at least checked the rdeps before dropping packages, at least evaluating if breaking things is alrightif he really likes to break packages :/ On Sun, 15 Sep 2019, 11:09 am Jelmer Vernooij, <jelmer@jelmer.uk> wrote: > > > On 15 September 2019 01:15:11 CEST, Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> > wrote: > >On Saturday, September 14, 2019 6:43:13 PM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> As I wrongly thought python-extras was used only by OpenStack stuff, > >I > >> removed Python 2 support for it. Then someone filed a bug against > >> python-testtools (ScottK, I believe) saying that it became RC. > >> Therefore, I went ahead and removed Python 2 support for testtools, > >but > >> now, this implies that a few packages which I didn't wish to impact > >are > >> also RC: > >> > >> * bzr-builddeb > >> * bzr-email > >> * bzr-fastimport > >> * bzr-git > >> * bzr-stats > >> * bzr-upload > >> * loggerhead > >> > >> So, basically, unfortunately, Bazaar has lost some of its build > >> dependencies. > >> > >> So, I went ahead, and looked what I could do for Bazaar. > >Unfortunately, > >> when looking at: > >> https://launchpad.net/bzr > >> > >> I can see no release since January 2016, no daily archive. The last > >> commit in the bzr repository of bzr is from 2017-03-17. > >> > >> Then I went to see how much Python 3 effort would be needed, and I > >> quickly gave up. It'd be A LOT of work, but nobody seems doing ANY > >work > >> on bzr anymore. > >> > >> So I wonder: is it time to remove bazaar from Debian? Or is there any > >> vague plan to make it work with Python 3? If we are to remove it from > >> Debian, then we'd better do it ASAP. > > > >As I understand it, bazaar (bzr) is dead and being replaced by breezy > >(brz), > >which is python3 compatible. > > > >https://www.breezy-vcs.org/ > > > >My inference is that anything bzr specific can go, but I'm not involved > >in > >either project. > > Bzr maintainer / breezy upstream here. > > I'm planning to upload transitional packages to trigger upgrades from bzr > to Breezy. > > The packages for that are not ready yet though. Can we undo the dropping > of python-testtools in the meantime? > > Jelmer > >
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2019-09-15 01:20 +0200
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk> - 2019-09-15 11:10 +0200
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2019-09-15 14:30 +0200
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk> - 2019-09-15 17:40 +0200
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2019-09-16 00:40 +0200
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2019-09-16 09:20 +0200
A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-09-18 00:20 +0200
Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2019-09-18 19:40 +0200
Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-10-26 20:30 +0200
csiph-web