Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10480
| Path | csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: django-celery |
| Date | Fri, 27 Apr 2018 22:00:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <vJhHb-37q-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <vJ53j-1OA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Apr 27 19:56:11 2018 |
| Old-Return-Path | <zigo@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-5 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, ONEWORD=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -5 |
| Organization | Debian |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/15882 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/cad1d226-044d-ccc9-f4f5-5c2e9bfeb337@debian.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 22 |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Fri, 27 Apr 2018 21:55:50 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <cad1d226-044d-ccc9-f4f5-5c2e9bfeb337@debian.org> |
| X-Original-References | <87o9i59ni9.fsf@silverfish.pri> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10480 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 04/27/2018 08:22 AM, Brian May wrote: > Hello, > > Beginning to think we should seriously think about dropping this > package. It is badly neglected by upstream, and there are now better > alternatives. Such as django-celery-results (not sure if this is in > Debian). > > I attempted to fix it by upgrading to the latest upstream version (see > git repository), but there are a number of python errors running tests, > and I lack the interest in attempting to fix them (although at quick > glance some of these errors look trivial to fix...) > > As far as I am aware, nothing in Debian depends on django-celery. > > Any thoughts? I agree as well. Please file a bug for its removal. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
django-celery Brian May <brian@linuxpenguins.xyz> - 2018-04-27 08:30 +0200
Re: django-celery Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at> - 2018-04-27 09:20 +0200
Re: django-celery Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2018-04-27 22:00 +0200
Re: django-celery Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2018-05-01 10:40 +0200
csiph-web