Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Thomas Goirand Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: django-celery Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 22:00:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Apr 27 19:56:11 2018 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-5 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, ONEWORD=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5 Organization: Debian User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/15882 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/cad1d226-044d-ccc9-f4f5-5c2e9bfeb337@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 22 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 21:55:50 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <87o9i59ni9.fsf@silverfish.pri> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10480 On 04/27/2018 08:22 AM, Brian May wrote: > Hello, > > Beginning to think we should seriously think about dropping this > package. It is badly neglected by upstream, and there are now better > alternatives. Such as django-celery-results (not sure if this is in > Debian). > > I attempted to fix it by upgrading to the latest upstream version (see > git repository), but there are a number of python errors running tests, > and I lack the interest in attempting to fix them (although at quick > glance some of these errors look trivial to fix...) > > As far as I am aware, nothing in Debian depends on django-celery. > > Any thoughts? I agree as well. Please file a bug for its removal. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)