Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10072

Re: DPMT and git workflows

Path csiph.com!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.albasani.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: DPMT and git workflows
Date Fri, 19 Jan 2018 12:50:01 +0100
Message-ID <v9Dlf-2Oi-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <v93B7-4zG-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <v93B7-4zG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <v94dP-54V-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <v9D1U-2HS-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Jan 19 11:46:21 2018
Old-Return-Path <smcv@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition inline
User-Agent Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/15467
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20180119114559.GA8842@perpetual.pseudorandom.co.uk
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 17
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Fri, 19 Jan 2018 11:45:59 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID <20180119114559.GA8842@perpetual.pseudorandom.co.uk>
X-Original-References <CACttXDN-WMLhkKUNhVGZYAjZeLn-TsGapo+8qG=YhWW-zfhXmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACttXDP8Ksp2N5sd4iB9UzKsbQ5-LrQJ0Z5YteFSFqvMMWw-DQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180117221441.hcgd4uzxrfgm4vtv@ulmo.domecek> <20180119112557.GB22609@mitya57.me>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10072

Show key headers only | View raw


On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 at 14:25:57 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> I think for new packages it is better to use gbp-pq based workflow:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ

Is there consensus that the gbp-pq workflow is now allowed? I only
maintain one package in DPMT (tap.py) and every time I upload it I have
to remind myself how git-dpm works, so I'd like to switch it over to
gbp-pq as soon as I can.

Relatedly, Alioth is going to be shut down at some point, with git
repositories frozen and made read-only, so it would seem a good idea to
start migrating git packaging to salsa.debian.org before that happens.
python-modules-team and python-apps-team groups, perhaps? I can create
a python-modules-team group and migrate tap.py as a sample if people
would like to see an example package.

    smcv

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

FYI: Fwd: RFS: pygithub/1.35-1[ITA] "eamanu15 ." <emmanuelarias30@gmail.com> - 2018-01-17 22:40 +0100
  Re: FYI: Fwd: RFS: pygithub/1.35-1[ITA] Filip Pytloun <filip@pytloun.cz> - 2018-01-17 23:20 +0100
    Re: FYI: Fwd: RFS: pygithub/1.35-1[ITA] Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2018-01-19 12:30 +0100
      Re: DPMT and git workflows Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2018-01-19 12:50 +0100
        Re: DPMT and git workflows IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2018-01-19 18:40 +0100
          Re: DPMT and git workflows Stuart Prescott <stuart@debian.org> - 2018-01-20 00:30 +0100

csiph-web