Path: csiph.com!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.albasani.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Simon McVittie Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: DPMT and git workflows Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 12:50:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Jan 19 11:46:21 2018 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/15467 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20180119114559.GA8842@perpetual.pseudorandom.co.uk Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 17 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 11:45:59 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <20180119114559.GA8842@perpetual.pseudorandom.co.uk> X-Original-References: <20180117221441.hcgd4uzxrfgm4vtv@ulmo.domecek> <20180119112557.GB22609@mitya57.me> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10072 On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 at 14:25:57 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > I think for new packages it is better to use gbp-pq based workflow: > https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ Is there consensus that the gbp-pq workflow is now allowed? I only maintain one package in DPMT (tap.py) and every time I upload it I have to remind myself how git-dpm works, so I'd like to switch it over to gbp-pq as soon as I can. Relatedly, Alioth is going to be shut down at some point, with git repositories frozen and made read-only, so it would seem a good idea to start migrating git packaging to salsa.debian.org before that happens. python-modules-team and python-apps-team groups, perhaps? I can create a python-modules-team group and migrate tap.py as a sample if people would like to see an example package. smcv