Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9773

Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow

Path csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow
Date Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:02 +0200
Message-ID <ulL5U-5eE-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ubvc6-3xe-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubwhP-4rV-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org>, debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Sep 3 21:56:24 2017
Old-Return-Path <zigo@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate:hard: -5
X-Greylist delayed 428 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at bendel; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 21:56:07 UTC
Organization Debian
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Language en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/15154
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/b5265549-e260-da14-5a0b-494f57aad596@debian.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 39
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Sun, 3 Sep 2017 23:48:53 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <b5265549-e260-da14-5a0b-494f57aad596@debian.org>
X-Original-References <ad5e63a2-2e0a-84a4-f646-9958ec2652c0@lohutok.net> <20170806153751.GW2409@yuggoth.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:9773

Show key headers only | View raw


On 08/06/2017 05:37 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2017-08-06 10:44:36 -0400 (-0400), Allison Randal wrote:
>> The OpenStack packaging team has been sprinting at DebCamp, and
>> we're finally ready to move all general Python dependencies for
>> OpenStack over to DPMT. (We'll keep maintaining them, just within
>> DPMT using the DPMT workflow.)
>>
>> After chatting with tumbleweed, the current suggestion is that we
>> should migrate the packages straight into gbp pq instead of making
>> an intermediate stop with git-dpm.
> [...]
> 
> More a personal curiosity on my part (I'm now a little disappointed
> that I didn't make time to attend), but are you planning to leverage
> pristine tarballs as part of this workflow shift so you can take
> advantage of the version details set in the sdist metadata and the
> detached OpenPGP signatures provided upstream? Or are you sticking
> with operating on a local fork of upstream Git repositories (and
> generating intermediate sdists on the fly or supplying version data
> directly from the environment via debian/rules)?
> 
> I'm eager to see what upstream release management features you're
> taking advantage of so we can better know which of those efforts are
> valuable to distro package maintainers

Jeremy,

If you think what Alison described includes artifacts from upstream
OpenStack, you're mistaking. She was talking about moving *general
purpose* Python libraries only. The rest of will continue to use the
workflow of generating orig files using "git archive".

At least, that's what I understand from our sprint meetings, and that is
if anyone (but me) in the team dares to start doing a little bit of
packaging, which I haven't seen happening so far...

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> - 2017-08-06 17:00 +0200
  Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2017-08-06 18:10 +0200
    Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-08-06 18:30 +0200
      Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2017-08-06 20:30 +0200
        Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2017-08-06 21:00 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 21:10 +0200
            Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2017-08-06 21:20 +0200
              Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-09-04 00:00 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2017-08-06 23:50 +0200
            Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2017-08-07 00:30 +0200
              Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-09-04 00:20 +0200
            Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-08-07 05:00 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-08-07 16:50 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-08-08 00:20 +0200
            Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-08-08 01:20 +0200
        Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-08-06 21:00 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 21:10 +0200
        Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2017-08-07 20:00 +0200
    Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-09-04 00:00 +0200
  Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-08-07 01:10 +0200

csiph-web