Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9719

Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow

From Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow
Date 2017-08-07 05:00 +0200
Message-ID <ubGqR-2pI-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <ubwhP-4rV-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubwBc-4yy-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubytk-5JT-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubyWl-5Tz-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubBAR-7zG-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On August 6, 2017 5:24:59 PM EDT, Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>2017-08-06 14:53 GMT-04:00 Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org>:
>
>> Why would you need to repack a tarball just because it contains
>> prebuilt docs (non-DFSG-free licensed documentation aside)? I'm all
>>
>
>Lintian considers this as "bug": https://lintian.debian.
>org/tags/source-contains-prebuilt-sphinx-documentation.html
>(pedantic, I know).

Not all things linitian tags are bugs.  This is only a bug if the documentation can't be rebuilt from Debian Main.

Linitian is a tool to help maintainers.  Don't just blindly "fix" things on linitian's say so.  At most the is a hint to make sure that the documentation can be rebuilt.

Scott K

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> - 2017-08-06 17:00 +0200
  Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2017-08-06 18:10 +0200
    Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-08-06 18:30 +0200
      Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2017-08-06 20:30 +0200
        Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2017-08-06 21:00 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 21:10 +0200
            Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2017-08-06 21:20 +0200
              Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-09-04 00:00 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2017-08-06 23:50 +0200
            Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2017-08-07 00:30 +0200
              Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-09-04 00:20 +0200
            Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-08-07 05:00 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-08-07 16:50 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-08-08 00:20 +0200
            Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-08-08 01:20 +0200
        Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-08-06 21:00 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 21:10 +0200
        Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2017-08-07 20:00 +0200
    Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-09-04 00:00 +0200
  Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-08-07 01:10 +0200

csiph-web