Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9772

Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow

Path csiph.com!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow
Date Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:02 +0200
Message-ID <ulL5U-5eE-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ubvc6-3xe-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubwhP-4rV-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubwBc-4yy-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubytk-5JT-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubyWl-5Tz-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubz61-6bR-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubzfI-6eX-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org>, debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Sep 3 21:58:02 2017
Old-Return-Path <zigo@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate:hard: -5
Organization Debian
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Language en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/15155
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/80597d48-90e9-3d9e-d676-8634bee68ec9@debian.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 40
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Sun, 3 Sep 2017 23:57:40 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <80597d48-90e9-3d9e-d676-8634bee68ec9@debian.org>
X-Original-References <ad5e63a2-2e0a-84a4-f646-9958ec2652c0@lohutok.net> <20170806153751.GW2409@yuggoth.org> <39436F23-8AC3-4D53-908C-C87DCA12B8A9@kitterman.com> <CAOO6c=wrbdzdCzOwSiqvFOQ+zCW8DvWd_jw1n7Z=och7ubX-ig@mail.gmail.com> <20170806185344.GX2409@yuggoth.org> <75e5c522-f859-b105-c547-b053dbd20697@gmail.com> <20170806191537.GY2409@yuggoth.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:9772

Show key headers only | View raw


On 08/06/2017 09:15 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2017-08-06 20:00:59 +0100 (+0100), Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> [...]
>> You'd still have to clean the pre-built files, since they would be
>> overwritten by the build system and therefore dpkg-buildpackage
>> would complain if you run the build twice.
>>
>> So, you might as well just exclude them from the source straight
>> away, no?
> 
> Repacking an upstream tarball just to avoid needing to tell
> dh_install not to copy files from a particular path into the binary
> package seems the wrong way around to me

What's wrong is for upstream to pretend that one tarball / archive is
its released source, when in fact it contains binary / generated files.

A source tarball / archive from upstream must contain *only* source
code, nothing else. If it contains anything that comes from the original
source, then it's additional pain for the package maintainer.

> but maybe I'm missing
> something which makes that particularly complicated? This comes up
> on debian-mentors all the time, and the general advice is to avoid
> repacking tarballs unless there's a policy violation or you can get
> substantial (like in the >50% range) reduction in size on especially
> huge upstream tarballs.

That's one view, probably motivated by the fact it's probably easier to
deal with in the long run. However convenient it may be, I don't think
it feels "clean".

And by the way, when it comes to the OpenStack stuff, FTP masters have
already expressed their dislike of the upstream ChangeLog: it is a *WAY*
to big, at the level of megabytes sometimes, and it may appear in .deb
files that would otherwise be a few kilobytes. All this isn't new...

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> - 2017-08-06 17:00 +0200
  Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2017-08-06 18:10 +0200
    Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-08-06 18:30 +0200
      Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2017-08-06 20:30 +0200
        Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2017-08-06 21:00 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 21:10 +0200
            Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2017-08-06 21:20 +0200
              Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-09-04 00:00 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2017-08-06 23:50 +0200
            Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2017-08-07 00:30 +0200
              Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-09-04 00:20 +0200
            Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-08-07 05:00 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-08-07 16:50 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-08-08 00:20 +0200
            Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-08-08 01:20 +0200
        Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-08-06 21:00 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 21:10 +0200
        Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2017-08-07 20:00 +0200
    Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-09-04 00:00 +0200
  Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-08-07 01:10 +0200

csiph-web