Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9710

Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow

Path	csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow
Date	Sun, 06 Aug 2017 21:10:01 +0200
Message-ID	<ubz61-6bR-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<ubvc6-3xe-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubwhP-4rV-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubwBc-4yy-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubytk-5JT-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubyWl-5Tz-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Aug 6 19:01:16 2017
Old-Return-Path	<ghisvail@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-6.999 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=y0pUSYWXXatyE2hM0qLMYhF4cwONsijKFVCGRiG+ZCc=; b=Eyxx1VmsBTXA2VH+PPZfXi9HnEvoVIzWCRmJ614oufUr+nxX+LLnB3SCg5oYkyBN/+ K1GmZyLihII8CUKGhk39oqvlbF53phcjdMUm1ZRQL7P7tjedRssE+DzM8E6N2M+LUP1j TaPtbS1VuAQAI28gBAfKvVipionVq7802lemO8XgVLGPokwVDptiP7XvC0y1G5enMnYv lsiKpl2TJAflN65pXolV4Ryv1S2hepRpv116EOyTQFI/tcs2MeWb5Jl5FRIhjgDnaxtM eHKFcW27DXqCKS35KATLoO8248gRGrt7/eHR+W396R3PTUx4n8PaQaHTc3xV6v5WksG2 l5wQ==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y0pUSYWXXatyE2hM0qLMYhF4cwONsijKFVCGRiG+ZCc=; b=jntYjyidzJNe+scucje4NsZpau4rq/vww+64RgJpuDUs05fsnGlePF56QractAp86n kdj4LGJ4IPdKyDTUjSzb9ZrnPiCoDqiy/hQSiQsnvALGo5vq1063C38JXhahMGxxPpi7 w+2unftoX6GA7Ye/8LN/2jI+4rP11Dktg5DV9MxtjJ9/I3tqqMzzxcqY0qiCczC7ovwB voagXVsv6WISIEJbKPKvVxCeGX7Z2NJMPKmZrkrRvtK/+FIOQsBxwjPGLdqZIP1OxBqq KIskE3E0I+KVKWFgudebs9NTcON1BDx3b3Yzx1mTQu05yy6d82a1Rlr4kqWJzrNsA3z7 QoMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State	AIVw112TIr1qKoas1SZfhDPhg8mdW71bULAcqdA2/4eXyYWIuqZwo272 RX2rGy+b73Em66QankA=
X-Received	by 10.223.142.215 with SMTP id q81mr6877539wrb.15.1502046060723; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 12:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language	en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/15091
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/75e5c522-f859-b105-c547-b053dbd20697@gmail.com
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	18
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Sun, 6 Aug 2017 20:00:59 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<75e5c522-f859-b105-c547-b053dbd20697@gmail.com>
X-Original-References	<ad5e63a2-2e0a-84a4-f646-9958ec2652c0@lohutok.net> <20170806153751.GW2409@yuggoth.org> <39436F23-8AC3-4D53-908C-C87DCA12B8A9@kitterman.com> <CAOO6c=wrbdzdCzOwSiqvFOQ+zCW8DvWd_jw1n7Z=och7ubX-ig@mail.gmail.com> <20170806185344.GX2409@yuggoth.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:9710

Show key headers only | View raw

On 06/08/17 19:53, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> Why would you need to repack a tarball just because it contains
> prebuilt docs (non-DFSG-free licensed documentation aside)? I'm all
> for rebuilding those at deb build time just to be sure you have the
> right deps packaged too, but if the ones in the tarball are built
> from DFSG-compliant upstream source, included in the archive for
> that matter, then leaving the tarball pristine shouldn't be a policy
> violation, right? That's like repacking a tarball for an
> autotools-using project because upstream is shipping a configure
> script built from an included configure.in file.

You'd still have to clean the pre-built files, since they would be 
overwritten by the build system and therefore dpkg-buildpackage would 
complain if you run the build twice.

So, you might as well just exclude them from the source straight away, no?

Ghis

Thread

a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> - 2017-08-06 17:00 +0200
  Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2017-08-06 18:10 +0200
    Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-08-06 18:30 +0200
      Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2017-08-06 20:30 +0200
        Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2017-08-06 21:00 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 21:10 +0200
            Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2017-08-06 21:20 +0200
              Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-09-04 00:00 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2017-08-06 23:50 +0200
            Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2017-08-07 00:30 +0200
              Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-09-04 00:20 +0200
            Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-08-07 05:00 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-08-07 16:50 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2017-08-08 00:20 +0200
            Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-08-08 01:20 +0200
        Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-08-06 21:00 +0200
          Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 21:10 +0200
        Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2017-08-07 20:00 +0200
    Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-09-04 00:00 +0200
  Re: a few quick questions on gbp pq workflow Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2017-08-07 01:10 +0200

csiph-web