Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8858

Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string>

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string>
Date Sat, 10 Sep 2016 18:40:01 +0200
Message-ID <sfTtT-2Br-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sfQPo-QB-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sfRLs-1tp-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <sfSet-1Sd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sfSRc-252-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <sfTke-2xR-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Sep 10 16:30:47 2016
Old-Return-Path <sandro.tosi@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.697 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=CLLk7M+Stf4XJc0/VVptvKOdfoviaRVC82rx9qsx3sM=; b=Pe1SoE6dOVi2wffACYYWs6Yzape3UbpYFR/csduChErF3QgnSp/1t+Wth0XjZ99PPx PCgVSRaU9N++IJ4wmRqgBrKmkRDCwVVl5aVdbpTJ8i5bWmR99PQQzy7YfjN+Fmqqpryi jkQk+rm1LzOLKPnOyoND7uOtpJIKtOY7mSiaUiCdgdBZqnX31r1tsKv5G4PuhBvYF0aY q5vEY7vcNWYeZegugSPwXdayG2c+vGFjz07Lk0kS73Eh2IqKEv1ZTYkjbuRu2oCW1D1q +Xj5e6gao+JV3y/cuVrW8YJxDtdDNPb/5m/IdQOlCNqoRgH06VKHtOmEfmwXV1zJ/nm5 K8qg==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=CLLk7M+Stf4XJc0/VVptvKOdfoviaRVC82rx9qsx3sM=; b=PNqYUECXqHy1FSrNSCD2HegpI6OClzq7x5iDgUjBXo2hVEj61HkUKHByVCiHI6D3PD 30/l3kktARazcO0YnznCKzR2hVXl2QyF5TrnC93Wu7wHBK0qgn30hNAXzZt8KWGRAkQV H0XPe29td1dN/o+c1pYHpuNVBdUi5Eu2H5kBm/zLFRfEolR8Fgfxe3aokmLNqw4AH/pN xjKKtBwgmhjp4FTWKOqhJ8w3jwQWwPe7auZ6TDk7DcEt5DzBdLh8XGriwhR3SjdDZDZO eEWcfcLuIUYREglHFNyHtjV6JUXoXM8Kf7qKm1BptmMNT1IKEugHaYdqCWlKUELM/XDG MmFg==
X-Gm-Message-State AE9vXwPmp//PAsp3r3UkX3GmJnRFBIbXPuTdUqqq5SePWjHgbXn0Sws9E3RVb/qyv0+d1NIiZuRVDloMOF/xQg==
X-Received by 10.25.215.35 with SMTP id o35mr3092991lfg.40.1473525030374; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 09:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Google-Sender-Auth NNVRfXdEv0hEqFPNEBL9kYEYTfY
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/14196
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAB4XWXyhtZfm4DKHHoJnnnPiRYq+85nwBM5MHR050bdctuGywA@mail.gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 22
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Date Sat, 10 Sep 2016 17:29:59 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <CAB4XWXyhtZfm4DKHHoJnnnPiRYq+85nwBM5MHR050bdctuGywA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <CAB4XWXzJumTLOn3cer-s-Czz9nOqxk6PCTaBzFUizO2Bgh4GPQ@mail.gmail.com> <20160910143220.xjrowygwxhbs56jw@nuc> <CAB4XWXwEKTqMc4WwvsL5ZAC=6zz_HC0UK6Xu66dLCY=qwRCS7Q@mail.gmail.com> <20160910153412.efnwyunnwe4vfyqk@nuc> <20160910162010.p7h4l3zrlkronmxb@chase.mapreri.org>
X-Original-Sender sandro.tosi@gmail.com
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8858

Show key headers only | View raw


On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> wrote:
> The correct behaviour if they really want to avoid spam to even reach
> the spam folder, is to accept the email, and discard it.

err that's wrong, so wrong. every email provider with a handful of
users rejects spam messages in the smtp session; not doing so is a
waste of time, it doesnt give any information back to the sender (that
in some rare case is a human and really wants to know the email was
not received) and in some countries (italy to name one) you would be
breaking the law accepting emails and not delivering them to the
recipient.

now that we discussed at length how we should handle the smtp service
with spam, can we please get back on topic? is it possible for the
admins to disable the auto-membership-suspend option on the the python
teams mailing list? is it something others would rather keep or not?

-- 
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-09-10 15:50 +0200
  Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> - 2016-09-10 16:50 +0200
    Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-09-10 17:20 +0200
      Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> - 2016-09-10 18:00 +0200
        Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2016-09-10 18:30 +0200
          Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-09-10 18:40 +0200
            Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-09-10 20:50 +0200
        Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-09-23 16:20 +0200
          Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> - 2016-09-23 16:40 +0200
          Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2016-09-23 17:00 +0200
          Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-09-23 20:10 +0200
    Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-09-10 20:50 +0200
  Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-09-10 20:40 +0200
    Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> "Paul R. Tagliamonte" <paultag@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 21:00 +0200
    Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-09-10 21:30 +0200
      Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-09-11 05:00 +0200
        Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-09-11 10:50 +0200
          Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2016-09-11 11:00 +0200
            Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-09-11 11:50 +0200
              Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org> - 2016-09-11 21:40 +0200
                Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-09-15 14:20 +0200
          Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm <string> Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-09-11 20:30 +0200

csiph-web