Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8775

Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT

Path csiph.com!news.freedyn.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT
Date Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:01 +0200
Message-ID <s6y5j-2Jd-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <s4kSS-3iq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4ne2-4FM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4oab-5fc-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4w7D-24x-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4wU1-2Bz-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4GTp-n4-83@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4IBQ-1DK-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <s6xVD-2Er-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Aug 15 21:55:49 2016
Old-Return-Path <barry@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-10.859 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5
X-Mailer Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/m7rgPmpf.KUNDol+fgV2jVM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/14116
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20160815175531.2d67c0ab@subdivisions.wooz.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 69
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Mon, 15 Aug 2016 17:55:31 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID <20160815175531.2d67c0ab@subdivisions.wooz.org>
X-Original-References <20160809192733.pfsnzejxlmd3knbe@p1otr.com> <356e3407-7970-5c4f-f963-60664898548a@debian.org> <20160809225020.GA30494@fama> <CAB4XWXyt2kqg0ThuFKyi48eMp86jYgLZUyL-LBU8dOq3Y+9cnQ@mail.gmail.com> <ab6efb18-10f2-7372-f7e5-b3a20add40e3@debian.org> <87fuqccv6p.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <20160810164140.48f7fd42@subdivisions.wooz.org> <bfd96239-9434-e967-bc97-f0cae888ee5f@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8775

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Aug 15, 2016, at 11:44 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:

>If we decide to use gbp-pq, in fact, we're deciding to not decide, and anyone
>can use PoQ (my choice, for example). Indeed, the way to store the patches is
>PoQ, and you then "gbp-pq import", modify, then "gbp-pq export" and store the
>packaging branch like this (ie: like a PoQ branch). So, basically, we'll be
>back to what everyone else is doing (ie: 99% of git maintained packages in
>Debian as much as I saw).

That sounds perfect then!

>IMO, that's required if we decide to continue using pristine-tar (which
>I don't think is a good idea, but let's not discuss that, as there seem
>to be a consensus for it).

So at a minimum:

----gbp.conf----
[import-orig]
pristine-tar = True
----gbp.conf----

Looking at my ~/.gbp.conf file, I have a bunch of other entries, some of which
are probably not appropriate for team settings.  I'd suggest `sign-tags=True`
though.

*Maybe* also these as conveniences:

[import-orig]
postimport = gbp dch -N%(version)s
import-msg = New upstream release.

What else?

Cheers,
-Barry

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-08-09 21:30 +0200
  Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Daniel Stender <stender@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 00:00 +0200
    Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 00:10 +0200
    PAPT Git (was: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt) "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 01:00 +0200
      Re: PAPT Git (was: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt) Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 09:30 +0200
        Re: PAPT Git Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 09:40 +0200
        Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 10:20 +0200
          Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 11:00 +0200
          Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was: PAPT Git) Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 12:50 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 16:20 +0200
          Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> - 2016-08-10 21:00 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 22:50 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 01:20 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 15:30 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 18:10 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-08-15 23:50 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-16 00:00 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 23:00 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-08-12 12:40 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net> - 2016-08-13 00:00 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-13 00:40 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net> - 2016-08-16 22:40 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2016-08-31 23:50 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-09-02 21:20 +0200
  Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2016-08-31 23:50 +0200

csiph-web