Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8776

Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT
Date Tue, 16 Aug 2016 22:40:02 +0200
Message-ID <s6Tjs-7Qi-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <s4kSS-3iq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4ne2-4FM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4oab-5fc-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4w7D-24x-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4wU1-2Bz-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4GTp-n4-83@gated-at.bofh.it> <s5sEF-7nQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <s5thn-7Rw-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Aug 16 20:39:38 2016
Old-Return-Path <sergiodj@sergiodj.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-13.267 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -6.1
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sergiodj.net; s=20160602; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=ha9IvSEtMu9mSiltNvxob+A0SWtKiZy9P8QxIDD1NPc=; b=2VjfVluoeNskJ2NhmExiHebee3k34QB3ataVhc55v1oz7xcuPCMg4nn667wkzAa5ANly29lBygSrEb3c7KrZ7D0E+zKonEAc4S88a4l+zUvDnjnP9gJNQ/vUTmX1mSLUtoYl3ZXAZn490FF4YBMyhEZQBL9jh7voqxkL/pmEte4=;
X-URL http://blog.sergiodj.net
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/14117
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87bn0scutz.fsf@sergiodj.net
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 60
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:39:04 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID <87bn0scutz.fsf@sergiodj.net>
X-Original-References <20160809192733.pfsnzejxlmd3knbe@p1otr.com> <356e3407-7970-5c4f-f963-60664898548a@debian.org> <20160809225020.GA30494@fama> <CAB4XWXyt2kqg0ThuFKyi48eMp86jYgLZUyL-LBU8dOq3Y+9cnQ@mail.gmail.com> <ab6efb18-10f2-7372-f7e5-b3a20add40e3@debian.org> <87fuqccv6p.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <87a8gh64j0.fsf@sergiodj.net> <20160812183909.392e6987@subdivisions.wooz.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8776

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Friday, August 12 2016, Barry Warsaw wrote:

> On Aug 12, 2016, at 05:50 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>
>>I understand this is a matter of personal taste, but I beg to differ.  I
>>have been using git-buildpackage for most of my non-Python packages and,
>>despite really small nits here and there, I think it is an awesome tool.
>
> I think there are multiple ways in which git-buildpackage is used.  E.g. I use
> `gbp buildpackage` even for git-dpm maintained packages, to build the source
> package, etc.  (It even has a nicer `clone` command that makes it easy to
> actually get tracking branches; just wish it had something like
> `pull-and-update-all-branches` since it's a bit of a PITA to update the
> pristine-tar branch.)

Yeah, I use 'gbp dch' and 'gbp buildpackage' when dealing with git-dpm
packaging, too.

> It's just the few things that git-dpm adds on top of gbp that we're discussing
> getting rid of, like importing a new upstream, managing the quilt patch set,
> tagging.

Right, that's what I thought, and those things are exactly what make me
unhappy about using git-dpm :-).

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-08-09 21:30 +0200
  Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Daniel Stender <stender@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 00:00 +0200
    Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 00:10 +0200
    PAPT Git (was: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt) "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 01:00 +0200
      Re: PAPT Git (was: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt) Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 09:30 +0200
        Re: PAPT Git Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 09:40 +0200
        Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 10:20 +0200
          Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 11:00 +0200
          Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was: PAPT Git) Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 12:50 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 16:20 +0200
          Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> - 2016-08-10 21:00 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 22:50 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 01:20 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 15:30 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 18:10 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-08-15 23:50 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-16 00:00 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 23:00 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-08-12 12:40 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net> - 2016-08-13 00:00 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-13 00:40 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net> - 2016-08-16 22:40 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2016-08-31 23:50 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-09-02 21:20 +0200
  Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2016-08-31 23:50 +0200

csiph-web