Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8752

Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT
Date Sat, 13 Aug 2016 00:00:01 +0200
Message-ID <s5sEF-7nQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <s4kSS-3iq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4ne2-4FM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4oab-5fc-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4w7D-24x-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4wU1-2Bz-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4GTp-n4-83@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Aug 12 21:50:38 2016
Old-Return-Path <sergiodj@sergiodj.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-13.267 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -6.1
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sergiodj.net; s=20160602; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To:From; bh=fghIiUQ1DP1Yv4S9g7hHoN5EV4zTs6b6BIlOH7/8bQE=; b=AIp4HCsrpZNZThe+L12qN04C99k0ZDnAy7yyyFOybajroYajG8dwy2Qn4nhqlyS1Gm8GLPp1V51GjyyiIMi+Yc85RssR5RdNVPBHmw9Ls0SQRnekbwVuj9SulnrnSpWkZbxDlXPgz+ihxvIvzLoco7O0bN8Pp0z1+58lDzKZcaM=;
X-URL http://blog.sergiodj.net
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/14093
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87a8gh64j0.fsf@sergiodj.net
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 54
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Fri, 12 Aug 2016 17:50:11 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID <87a8gh64j0.fsf@sergiodj.net>
X-Original-References <20160809192733.pfsnzejxlmd3knbe@p1otr.com> <356e3407-7970-5c4f-f963-60664898548a@debian.org> <20160809225020.GA30494@fama> <CAB4XWXyt2kqg0ThuFKyi48eMp86jYgLZUyL-LBU8dOq3Y+9cnQ@mail.gmail.com> <ab6efb18-10f2-7372-f7e5-b3a20add40e3@debian.org> <87fuqccv6p.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8752

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Wednesday, August 10 2016, Nikolaus Rath wrote:

> I don't believe that switching from git-dpm to git-buildpackage is going
> to make things easier, it'll just be trading one set of problems for
> another.

I understand this is a matter of personal taste, but I beg to differ.  I
have been using git-buildpackage for most of my non-Python packages and,
despite really small nits here and there, I think it is an awesome tool.

git-dpm, OTOH, has several limitations (as already mentioned by others,
it's not trivial to merge changes to local patches, and it can be quite
complicated to import a new upstream version into the repository).
I have had to package some Python packages these last weeks, and every
time I had to deal with git-dpm I almost always stumbled upon some
idiosyncrasy that got in the way of my work.

Long story short: I am totally favorable to make the switch to
git-buildpackage (in fact, I recently raised this topic on IRC but the
conversation eventually died).

Cheers,

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-08-09 21:30 +0200
  Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Daniel Stender <stender@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 00:00 +0200
    Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 00:10 +0200
    PAPT Git (was: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt) "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 01:00 +0200
      Re: PAPT Git (was: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt) Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 09:30 +0200
        Re: PAPT Git Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 09:40 +0200
        Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 10:20 +0200
          Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 11:00 +0200
          Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was: PAPT Git) Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 12:50 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 16:20 +0200
          Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> - 2016-08-10 21:00 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 22:50 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 01:20 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 15:30 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 18:10 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-08-15 23:50 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-16 00:00 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 23:00 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-08-12 12:40 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net> - 2016-08-13 00:00 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-13 00:40 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net> - 2016-08-16 22:40 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2016-08-31 23:50 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-09-02 21:20 +0200
  Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2016-08-31 23:50 +0200

csiph-web