Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8751

Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT
Date	Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:40:01 +0200
Message-ID	<s5i2B-s6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<s4kSS-3iq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4ne2-4FM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4oab-5fc-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4w7D-24x-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4wU1-2Bz-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4GTp-n4-83@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4ILw-1Hq-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Aug 12 10:33:49 2016
Old-Return-Path	<brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.579 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	DYN_NJABL=ERR(0) NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 BL_NJABL=ERR(-1.5) CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .microcomaustralia. - helo: .mail-pa0-x241.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -5
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microcomaustralia.com.au; s=google; h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:organization:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=J/eIVjsLGaG2jlumgNqp8lwyr4kGmMhzn1K5g9Woal4=; b=Sx/wuU3CMie++ogHjviMMyi6Rez790O3uXvkJaIEmFKHnoj36b6m1pFT7/L72jyiA6 pG9R+b+OENVIlUEoTHc0piZ1URmsTSgkmIBr43eBqHu9DxZL0B5yPN8qWpsoKEunuhtn 9gBxWWNHOerczgpDVpce8cJcw8swar55ztmII=
X-Google-Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:organization :references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=J/eIVjsLGaG2jlumgNqp8lwyr4kGmMhzn1K5g9Woal4=; b=U3HZdnZqB8q/PBuhNnWir9pPMtV2s080nqO2bxfAWpfJu8Jk+tAghqFvztfURWCTyV cHZjho8jO9Wlu0QTCZ1yRRuUvSZWO2RfMpL1VO2mirrkZoRF+bDtfmnvdX5qd/md92p8 GTesqxyFnLNG4acECfMhS2ejy3lQvs/kJviOqy+zUpvcbfQGX01OGSwj9ae6I+vXBkGL o+ZrB8bodw4+GpX6771tItL8RB6JNfLwy33Oqbu0yCJfksY5qAXrIp7zpjLbdmqSX24E VNDRlswor2YKAissFdvJ6ZrRWiNNygrN4FzR2drKSSxMHydemiqY2X56L4iyqvxUT3jz QnHw==
X-Gm-Message-State	AEkooutjRds9FgSE2LZ2HrfiJ+UhBmo26zW4z1m0Ug8Yxa4xUMZ165hOuqM7jcSvwy7AGw==
X-Received	by 10.66.62.164 with SMTP id z4mr10985637par.156.1470997997074; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 03:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
Organization	Debian
User-Agent	Notmuch/0.22 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/14092
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87y4426zvd.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	17
X-Original-Date	Fri, 12 Aug 2016 20:33:10 +1000
X-Original-Message-ID	<87y4426zvd.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz>
X-Original-References	<20160809192733.pfsnzejxlmd3knbe@p1otr.com> <356e3407-7970-5c4f-f963-60664898548a@debian.org> <20160809225020.GA30494@fama> <CAB4XWXyt2kqg0ThuFKyi48eMp86jYgLZUyL-LBU8dOq3Y+9cnQ@mail.gmail.com> <ab6efb18-10f2-7372-f7e5-b3a20add40e3@debian.org> <87fuqccv6p.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <20160810205146.GB15321@home.ouaza.com>
X-Original-Sender	Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8751

Show key headers only | View raw

Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> writes:

> Anyway, +1 from me to switch to git-buildpackage and in fact among the
> python-django maintainers we are close to decide to switch back to
> git-buildpackage because it's really horrible to use when you want to
> merge across branches of different releases.

Have people here seen the following thread on debian-devel?

Subject: "[ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over
time"

Might be worth looking at this thread, even if the conclusion is that
this is not a good solution (actually I don't really understand it and
haven't time to understand it).
-- 
Brian May <bam@debian.org>

Thread

pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-08-09 21:30 +0200
  Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Daniel Stender <stender@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 00:00 +0200
    Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 00:10 +0200
    PAPT Git (was: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt) "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 01:00 +0200
      Re: PAPT Git (was: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt) Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 09:30 +0200
        Re: PAPT Git Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 09:40 +0200
        Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 10:20 +0200
          Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 11:00 +0200
          Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was: PAPT Git) Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 12:50 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 16:20 +0200
          Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> - 2016-08-10 21:00 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 22:50 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 01:20 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 15:30 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 18:10 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-08-15 23:50 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-16 00:00 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 23:00 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-08-12 12:40 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net> - 2016-08-13 00:00 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-13 00:40 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net> - 2016-08-16 22:40 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2016-08-31 23:50 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-09-02 21:20 +0200
  Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2016-08-31 23:50 +0200

csiph-web