Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8745

Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT
Date Wed, 10 Aug 2016 21:00:03 +0200
Message-ID <s4GTp-n4-83@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <s4kSS-3iq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4ne2-4FM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4oab-5fc-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4w7D-24x-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <s4wU1-2Bz-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Aug 10 18:53:36 2016
Old-Return-Path <Nikolaus@rath.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .rath. - helo: .out2-smtp.messagingengine. - helo-domain: .messagingengine.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=mnauvH6BDII3L1n VTqU3gT/ih0k=; b=j6OgNmHDlp1LOz6sWJ2XUVOIhaa4CRiudYU+H6XfHrrWn3h nBbntciLB9buD8X9itvTwnA20ELkOqkkGgyUDfSdnYeagCM6PZypp9vplWLc7s0i 1xGLJC3PudHrTR8E8rPVgEOfWRBK9YiHxgJ41TX0QOpLRnaynk/rgPdHUU6I=
X-Sasl-Enc jcsgl++Loc/FJuNEDvHglchPBl8xjb4GlGJ2EvaRxjpX 1470855199
Mail-Copies-To never
Mail-Followup-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
User-Agent Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/14086
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87fuqccv6p.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 32
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:53:18 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID <87fuqccv6p.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org>
X-Original-References <20160809192733.pfsnzejxlmd3knbe@p1otr.com> <356e3407-7970-5c4f-f963-60664898548a@debian.org> <20160809225020.GA30494@fama> <CAB4XWXyt2kqg0ThuFKyi48eMp86jYgLZUyL-LBU8dOq3Y+9cnQ@mail.gmail.com> <ab6efb18-10f2-7372-f7e5-b3a20add40e3@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8745

Show key headers only | View raw


On Aug 10 2016, Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> wrote:
> As I only heard complains about git-dpm, maybe someone would like to
> express his joy using it, and explain why they think it's a nice tool.
> But is there such person? It seems git-dpm only brings frustration.

In my opinion, git-dpm solves the problem of keeping a full history of
Debian source packages (i.e., patches applied and debian/patches/
populated) as well as possible. This means that it is often painful.

I think the only way to make this less painful is to get rid of the idea
of managing patches in a VCS and use something like gitpkg. This has the
drawback source package is now *generated* from the Git repository
(i.e., you can't do git clone + debuild), but it makes maintaining the
Git repository much less painful. Judging from all the attempts I've
seen so far, trying to put patches (i.e., the output of a VCS) under
version-control is just a doomed endeavor.


I don't believe that switching from git-dpm to git-buildpackage is going
to make things easier, it'll just be trading one set of problems for
another.


Best,
-Nikolaus

-- 
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F

             »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-08-09 21:30 +0200
  Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Daniel Stender <stender@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 00:00 +0200
    Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 00:10 +0200
    PAPT Git (was: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt) "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 01:00 +0200
      Re: PAPT Git (was: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt) Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 09:30 +0200
        Re: PAPT Git Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 09:40 +0200
        Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 10:20 +0200
          Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 11:00 +0200
          Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was: PAPT Git) Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 12:50 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 16:20 +0200
          Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> - 2016-08-10 21:00 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 22:50 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 01:20 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 15:30 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 18:10 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-08-15 23:50 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-16 00:00 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 23:00 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-08-12 12:40 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net> - 2016-08-13 00:00 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-13 00:40 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net> - 2016-08-16 22:40 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2016-08-31 23:50 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-09-02 21:20 +0200
  Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2016-08-31 23:50 +0200

csiph-web