Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14550

Re: Review of Debian package lazy-loader

From Bo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Review of Debian package lazy-loader
Date 2022-10-22 14:10 +0200
Message-ID <Fjlu9-fWP3-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <Fje9j-fSei-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 11:58:38PM -0400, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
>Hello,
>
>This is my review of the lazy-loader package you asked the Debian 
>Python Team to sponsor in the Debian archive.
>
>1. In d/control, I'm not sure to understand why the binary package is 
>marked as "Multi-Arch: foreign", as this package isn't arch dependent?

The binary package is arch dependent as it was marked as "Architecture: all"
I think. There is more knowledge for me to here:
https://wiki.debian.org/MultiArch/Hints#set_Multi-Arch:_foreign

Fixed it.

>
>

[...]
>You should instead run the upstream test suite as autopkgtests: they 
>are much more meaningful.
>
>Have a look at this example:
>
>https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/metalfinder/-/tree/debian/master/debian/tests
>

Ok, The package now is updated according to the all above review comments.

>6. In d/changelog, you marked your entry as "unstable", whereas it 
>should be UNRELEASED. Please re-read the DPT's policy with regards to 
>this.

Ok, this is different entry with previous package that has been
sponsored by others DD. But I think 'UNRELEASED' entry is right:)
>
>7. Although I have not listed them here, pretty much all of the 
>lintian tags raised are relevant errors that you should fix.

Yeah, I run lintian the package this time and it got nothing from my
chroot build. The only error from mentor is:
```
Package uploaded for the UNRELEASED distribution
````
I think it should be ok this time.

>
>----------------------------------
>
>You're 90% there!
>
>I've removed your package from the sponsor queue for now, but feel 
>free to re-add it when you feel like you've dealt with my review. I'll 
>be happy to sponsor it then.

Thanks you very much! I have updated it from your valueable review.
Please let me know if there is any issues.

-- 
Regards,
--
   Bo YU

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Review of Debian package lazy-loader Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@riseup.net> - 2022-10-22 06:20 +0200
  Re: Review of Debian package lazy-loader Bo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com> - 2022-10-22 14:10 +0200

csiph-web