Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14905

Bug#1030096: Any ideas Re: #1030096 dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail ?

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

I agree that xfailing the tests *may* be a reasonable solution.  I'm 
only saying that it should be done by someone with more idea than me of 
whether these particular tests are important, because blindly xfailing 
everything that fails is effectively not having tests.

If we do choose that approach, at least test_balance_expensive_tasks 
needs to be an outright xfail/skip not just a flaky, because when it 
fails it fails repeatedly.

On 06/02/2023 19:38, Diane Trout wrote:
> The most important thing about dask / dask.distributed is they really
> should be at about the same upstream version.

I knew that, and was planning on 2022.12.1 of both when I decided to go 
ahead with pandas.  What went wrong was that I only tested a build, not 
an autopkgtest, and thought the failing tests were dask.distributed's 
(known) inability to run all its tests in a buildd environment.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027254#21

> I'm not 100% sure how to
> mark that in the d/control file.

Possibly
Depends: python3-dask (>= 2022.12.1~), python3-dask (<< 2022.12.2~)
but I haven't tested that.

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1030096: Any ideas Re: #1030096 dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail ? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2023-02-06 09:10 +0100
  Bug#1030096: Any ideas Re: #1030096 dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail ? Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2023-02-06 20:40 +0100
    Bug#1030096: Any ideas Re: #1030096 dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail ? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2023-02-06 22:50 +0100

csiph-web