Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1136713
| From | "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Bug#1030096: Any ideas Re: #1030096 dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail ? |
| Date | 2023-02-06 22:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FWhx7-403m-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <FW4JA-3RYF-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <FW6Ln-3Tee-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FWfvj-3YON-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <FTPEZ-2kFc-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FWfvj-3YON-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
I agree that xfailing the tests *may* be a reasonable solution. I'm only saying that it should be done by someone with more idea than me of whether these particular tests are important, because blindly xfailing everything that fails is effectively not having tests. If we do choose that approach, at least test_balance_expensive_tasks needs to be an outright xfail/skip not just a flaky, because when it fails it fails repeatedly. On 06/02/2023 19:38, Diane Trout wrote: > The most important thing about dask / dask.distributed is they really > should be at about the same upstream version. I knew that, and was planning on 2022.12.1 of both when I decided to go ahead with pandas. What went wrong was that I only tested a build, not an autopkgtest, and thought the failing tests were dask.distributed's (known) inability to run all its tests in a buildd environment. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027254#21 > I'm not 100% sure how to > mark that in the d/control file. Possibly Depends: python3-dask (>= 2022.12.1~), python3-dask (<< 2022.12.2~) but I haven't tested that.
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1030096: #1030096 dask.distributed autopkgtest fail "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2023-02-04 19:40 +0100
Bug#1030096: #1030096 dask.distributed autopkgtest fail Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> - 2023-02-05 10:20 +0100
Bug#1030096: Any ideas Re: #1030096 dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail ? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2023-02-06 09:10 +0100
Bug#1030096: Any ideas Re: #1030096 dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail ? Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2023-02-06 20:40 +0100
Bug#1030096: Any ideas Re: #1030096 dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail ? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2023-02-06 22:50 +0100
Bug#1030096: Any ideas Re: #1030096 dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail ? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2023-02-07 08:40 +0100
Bug#1030096: dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2023-02-09 07:40 +0100
Bug#1030096: dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2023-02-09 18:10 +0100
Bug#1030096: dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2023-02-09 22:40 +0100
Bug#1030096: dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2023-02-09 23:00 +0100
Bug#1030096: dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2023-02-09 23:10 +0100
Bug#1030096: dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org> - 2023-02-10 04:20 +0100
Bug#1030096: dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2023-02-10 04:50 +0100
Bug#1030096: dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org> - 2023-02-10 09:20 +0100
Bug#1030096: dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> - 2023-02-09 07:40 +0100
csiph-web