Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14890

Bug#1030530: Python 3.10 in bookworm

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Bug#1030530: Python 3.10 in bookworm
Date Sun, 05 Feb 2023 12:40:01 +0100
Message-ID <FVLxf-3BSN-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <FVu3n-3q2E-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Sun Feb 5 11:36:09 2023
Old-Return-Path <debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
X-Spam-Flag NO
X-Spam-Score -3.253
Reply-To Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr>, 1030530@bugs.debian.org
Resent-To debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
X-Debian-Pr-Message followup 1030530
X-Debian-Pr-Package python3.10
X-Debian-Pr-Source python3.10
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding base64
X-Greylist delayed 455 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at buxtehude; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 11:33:01 UTC
X-Debian-Message from BTS
X-Mailing-List <debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1758263
List-ID <debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/debian-bugs-dist
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 17
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc 1030530@bugs.debian.org, Debian Python list <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Sun, 05 Feb 2023 12:25:18 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <bSBnkKLy6CK.A.zNG.pS53jB@bendel>
X-Original-References <167552963796.11916.18092939128144656065.reportbug@localhost>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1136431 linux.debian.maint.python:14890

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


How about fixing the 3.11 issues if you hit them ? How about using Buster and 3.9 if 3.11 doesn't work (yet) for you ?

Thomas Goirand (zigo)
On Feb 5, 2023 11:38, Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> wrote:
>
> Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in 
> bookworm? 
>
> I was trying to run some experiments in a virtual environment a few 
> days ago, and it turns out that several of the Python packages I 
> needed do not yet run on Python 3.11.  I was saved by being able to 
> run in a Python 3.10 venv and download all the required packages from 
> PyPI.  If bookworm shipped without python3.10, I would not have been 
> able to do my work.  Removing python3.10 from bookworm will seriously 
> affect many of our users in a similar situation to me. 
>
> Best wishes, 
>
>    Julian 
>
> P.S. We should also fix #1036268 if we do keep python3.10 in bookworm; 
> I'm happy to do an NMU if needed. 
>

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1030530: Python 3.10 in bookworm Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr> - 2023-02-05 12:40 +0100

csiph-web