Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14890 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-02-05 12:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2023-02-05 12:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#1030530: Python 3.10 in bookworm Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr> - 2023-02-05 12:40 +0100
| From | Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-05 12:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#1030530: Python 3.10 in bookworm |
| Message-ID | <FVLxf-3BSN-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
How about fixing the 3.11 issues if you hit them ? How about using Buster and 3.9 if 3.11 doesn't work (yet) for you ? Thomas Goirand (zigo) On Feb 5, 2023 11:38, Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> wrote: > > Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in > bookworm? > > I was trying to run some experiments in a virtual environment a few > days ago, and it turns out that several of the Python packages I > needed do not yet run on Python 3.11. I was saved by being able to > run in a Python 3.10 venv and download all the required packages from > PyPI. If bookworm shipped without python3.10, I would not have been > able to do my work. Removing python3.10 from bookworm will seriously > affect many of our users in a similar situation to me. > > Best wishes, > > Julian > > P.S. We should also fix #1036268 if we do keep python3.10 in bookworm; > I'm happy to do an NMU if needed. >
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web