Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14784
| From | Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Help to package xdoctest |
| Date | 2022-12-27 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FHjhv-dDs6-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <FGPMt-djQo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Bo (2022.12.26_07:01:29_+0000) > W: python3-xdoctest: no-manual-page [usr/bin/xdoctest] Yeah, applications *should* have manual pages, but it's not required. If you need more tooling to build the manpage, it can wait until those tools are available in Debian. > P: xdoctest source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file 563 > 512 [dev/outline.md:11] > X: xdoctest source: debian-watch-does-not-check-openpgp-signature [debian/watch] I'd ignore those. > X: python3-xdoctest: application-in-library-section python [usr/bin/xdoctest] > X: python3-xdoctest: library-package-name-for-application [usr/bin/xdoctest] So, technically, xdoctest could be split into an xdoctest binary package (the command) and python3-xdoctest (the library). Personally, I don't bother to do that for niche tools like this. If it was a more user-oriented package, then it could make more sense to split it. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 415 683 3272
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Help to package xdoctest Bo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com> - 2022-12-26 08:10 +0100 Re: Help to package xdoctest Bo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 14:10 +0100 Re: Help to package xdoctest Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-12-27 15:40 +0100
csiph-web