Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.us.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Stefano Rivera Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Help to package xdoctest Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 15:40:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Bo YU X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Dec 27 14:39:34 2022 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.862 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_FROM_MX=-3.1; rate: -4.6 Mail-Followup-To: Bo YU , debian-python X-Gpg-Public-Key: http://www.rivera.za.net/stefano.gpg MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20201127 X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/20652 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20221227143911.oxvlhrzvxythzd5m@satie.tumbleweed.org.za Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 26 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python X-Original-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 14:39:11 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <20221227143911.oxvlhrzvxythzd5m@satie.tumbleweed.org.za> X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14784 Hi Bo (2022.12.26_07:01:29_+0000) > W: python3-xdoctest: no-manual-page [usr/bin/xdoctest] Yeah, applications *should* have manual pages, but it's not required. If you need more tooling to build the manpage, it can wait until those tools are available in Debian. > P: xdoctest source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file 563 > 512 [dev/outline.md:11] > X: xdoctest source: debian-watch-does-not-check-openpgp-signature [debian/watch] I'd ignore those. > X: python3-xdoctest: application-in-library-section python [usr/bin/xdoctest] > X: python3-xdoctest: library-package-name-for-application [usr/bin/xdoctest] So, technically, xdoctest could be split into an xdoctest binary package (the command) and python3-xdoctest (the library). Personally, I don't bother to do that for niche tools like this. If it was a more user-oriented package, then it could make more sense to split it. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 415 683 3272