Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14776
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python, linux.debian.devel.release |
| Subject | Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? |
| Date | Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:30:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FFCRj-cwQi-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <FFc0N-cezl-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <FFhtv-chWO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FFtbj-cp3s-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FFtkZ-cp6S-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FFyNH-csvI-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Dec 22 23:21:12 2022 |
| Old-Return-Path | <lumin@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-6.963 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -3.5 |
| X-Riseup-User-ID | 8AF3E50B07F59E09153286CC0319D413F8DBDAC325318DBF171681D1CDF3B1DD |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20644 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/acfdf0159be29eb209369bb5b820d08344f7ef16.camel@riseup.net |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 43 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Thu, 22 Dec 2022 18:04:15 -0500 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <acfdf0159be29eb209369bb5b820d08344f7ef16.camel@riseup.net> |
| X-Original-References | <1fc30086-582e-36e1-f530-39323e85cd8d@ubuntu.com> <CAB4XWXwpPOSfaV6YiYU2C9hBkYP1v2SpPHn8HWCkf66b92Q_4w@mail.gmail.com> <20221222124417.xgorgtkfhyqyof53@satie.tumbleweed.org.za> <20221222125620.54pr4bqoi3fuww6e@mail.gaussglocke.de> <20221222184627.ej4of62ugpq3xlbw@satie.tumbleweed.org.za> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14776 linux.debian.devel.release:112539 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
I'm the regular uploader of python3-llvmlite. Please give up with numba. Its core dependency llvmlite is not even ready for llvm != 11, while Sid had already get llvm-11 removed. I have tried to cherry-pick an upstream fix to bump llvmlite's llvm dependency to 12/14, but the autopkgtest shows numba would be vastly broken. Unless they bump LLVM dependency to a newer version: https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/issues/897 https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/pull/830 there is zero chance to get numba in stable. I do not want to bump LLVM by force and leave a broken package in stable. llvmlite's python 3.11 support is still on the way: https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/issues/885 One possibility is that we may apply for freeze exception and wait for the llvmlite v0.40.0 release and see whether they will bump llvm dependency. On Thu, 2022-12-22 at 18:46 +0000, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Timo (2022.12.22_12:56:20_+0000) > > > There have been rebuilds in Ubuntu that give us some idea of how much > > > work remains. I think it's tractable, but also will have some package > > > casualties. > > I have some spare time right now, and I am happy to help > > work on problematic cases, so hopefully nobody will feel left out in > > the cold with their favorite packages. > > Offhand, the one I most expect trouble with is numba. We were reliant on > upstream for the 3.10 transition, and probably will be for 3.11. > > Thanks for your help with pony ORM, Timo. I didn't think we'd be able to > port that without upstream, but it did end up being tractable. > > I'm expecting to have more time in the upcoming weeks, too. > > So, release team, I still think we should go ahead! > > SR >
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com> - 2022-12-21 19:30 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-12-22 01:20 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2022-12-22 02:30 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2022-12-22 06:10 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-28 02:00 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2022-12-30 10:30 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2023-01-05 14:00 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2023-01-07 09:10 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2023-01-07 09:30 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2023-01-09 16:50 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2023-01-16 17:30 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2023-01-17 01:10 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2023-01-17 07:50 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Étienne Mollier <emollier@emlwks999.eu> - 2023-01-10 22:50 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-12-22 13:50 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-12-22 14:00 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-12-22 19:50 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2022-12-23 00:30 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2022-12-23 00:40 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2022-12-26 21:30 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2022-12-26 21:50 +0100
csiph-web