Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14771
| From | Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python, linux.debian.devel.release |
| Subject | Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? |
| Date | 2022-12-22 02:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FFizf-cix6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <FFc0N-cezl-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <FFhtv-chWO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> writes: > thoughts from a concerned maintainer > Sandro, thank you for writing this email. > > it seems this email advocates for a "let's wing it"[1] type of transition. > > [1] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/wing_it > > It appears there has been little work in preparing the work to > introduce python3.11 from its maintainer, instead that works has been > pushed downstream to maintainers. > > if we continue with the plan as described above, several python > libraries/applications maintainers will be left with the short end of > the stick and deal with an unknown amount of issues (upstream fixes > not available, not ready and or/ not released, rushed, etc) with less > than a month from the beginning of the transition freeze[2] > Agreed. At a bare minimum, complete data from ratt (Rebuild All The Things) should be required at this point. > [2] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html > > [2] also highlights at the very beginning "Plan your changes for > bullseye", this change appears as if it was not planned and we should > be skeptical to proceed without further (and in advance) understanding > of the impact it may have on Bullseye. > 100% +1 I'm especially concerned about how a clear plan was not communicated to other teams--whose work will be broken by the proposed transition, were an exception to be granted. Debian is not a paragon of community if it makes late, unannounced changes that result in a yet-undetermined number of projects being dropped from bookworm's release. If Python 3.11 as the only supported version is a release goal, then the freeze schedule would need to be modified. Regards, Nicholas
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com> - 2022-12-21 19:30 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-12-22 01:20 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2022-12-22 02:30 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2022-12-22 06:10 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-28 02:00 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2022-12-30 10:30 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2023-01-05 14:00 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2023-01-07 09:10 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2023-01-07 09:30 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2023-01-09 16:50 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2023-01-16 17:30 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2023-01-17 01:10 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2023-01-17 07:50 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Étienne Mollier <emollier@emlwks999.eu> - 2023-01-10 22:50 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-12-22 13:50 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-12-22 14:00 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-12-22 19:50 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2022-12-23 00:30 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2022-12-23 00:40 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2022-12-26 21:30 +0100
Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2022-12-26 21:50 +0100
csiph-web