Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14727
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | review for pytest-fail-slow/0.3.0-1 |
| Date | Wed, 14 Dec 2022 14:00:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FCzwB-aBJg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Dec 14 12:52:04 2022 |
| Old-Return-Path | <jcfp@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-115.024 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.515, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Mailer | Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/dHeXCKgJtgNuINdOx43.lhm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 |
| X-Debian-User | jcfp |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20593 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20221214135120.3ea97dce@debian.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 54 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:51:20 +0100 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <20221214135120.3ea97dce@debian.org> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14727 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
hi Ileana,
I took a look at pytest-fail-slow, up for sponsorship in the Python
team.
Some repo issues:
* It appears tags were not pushed, as there's no tags at all in the
repo - not even for the imported upstream release - although the
typical gbp workflow would handle that.
* The upstream tarball produced by uscan differs from the
pristine-tar data. Are you making use of the standard tools for
importing new releases, e.g. 'gbp import-orig --pristine-tar
--uscan' or similar?
Then for the packaging itself (which is in pretty good shape):
* changelog: please leave the release at UNRELEASED, cf. team policy.
* control:
+ the binary pkg for a pytest plugin is commonly named
python3-pytest-<name-of-plugin>;
+ short description: Pytest plugin to [current description]?
* upstream/metadata missing.
* no autopkgtest? Should be a trivial yet *very* useful addition,
providing early warning for things like compatibility issues with
newer pytest releases before packages using the plugin start seeing
failures.
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
review for pytest-fail-slow/0.3.0-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2022-12-14 14:00 +0100 Re: review for pytest-fail-slow/0.3.0-1 Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95@gmail.com> - 2022-12-21 18:10 +0100
csiph-web