Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14716
| From | Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages |
| Date | 2022-12-12 03:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FBH3b-a3G5-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <FBFNL-a30x-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FBGgN-a3ac-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FBGA9-a3vQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> >> My proposal as stated at the top is to start from now on to prepend > >> `python` to all NEW source packages in DPT, with the option to rename > >> existing packages at a later date. > >> > >> What are other team members' opinions on this? > > > > For packages that on contain a python module/extension, I think it's not horrible, but I don't see why it's better to diverge from upstream naming. > > I tend to agree with Sandro on for this use case. True, i was mostly referring to modules, as that's the most numerous type of packages we have > > For packages that contain or are primarily applications, I don't think it's a good idea. > > Ditto on that one, I don't feel having "python-supysonic" would be a > good naming scheme... please note that would be just for source packages, the user-facing ones can still be `supysonic` as that's what you expect to install On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 8:53 PM Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> wrote: > What problem are you trying to solve? no problem specifically, i just feel that having a consistent scheme would benefit Debian and then team. -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-12-12 02:30 +0100
Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2022-12-12 03:00 +0100
Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-12-12 03:20 +0100
Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-12-12 03:50 +0100
Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2022-12-12 05:40 +0100
Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages Joseph Nahmias <jello@debian.org> - 2022-12-20 15:50 +0100
Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages Steffen Moeller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2022-12-20 01:00 +0100
csiph-web