Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14713
| From | Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages |
| Date | 2022-12-12 02:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FBFNL-a30x-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Proposal: the DPT will start adding a `python-` prefix to NEW source packages names, unless the upstream project already contains it AFAICT all other major languages ecosystems packaging teams use a (semi?)mandatory tag to identify their source packages (results below from a very quick look at Sources, top results only): prefix: golang, rust, r, node, ruby, haskell, php, ocaml, python (on a voluntary basis), and others prefix+suffix: perl At the beginning, I remember being in favor of the current status quo in DPT, where each maintainer can choose to add `python-` if they feel like it, or just use the upstream name. Thru the years, i've grown more uncomfortable with this situation and i think the fact we dont mandate a `python` prefix in the team source packages names (and thus guiding the rest of the python packagers within Debian towards a common style) is detrimental to Debian as a whole, and we should change it. My proposal as stated at the top is to start from now on to prepend `python` to all NEW source packages in DPT, with the option to rename existing packages at a later date. What are other team members' opinions on this? Regards, -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-12-12 02:30 +0100
Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2022-12-12 03:00 +0100
Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-12-12 03:20 +0100
Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-12-12 03:50 +0100
Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2022-12-12 05:40 +0100
Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages Joseph Nahmias <jello@debian.org> - 2022-12-20 15:50 +0100
Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages Steffen Moeller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2022-12-20 01:00 +0100
csiph-web