Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14138

Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hello again,
Some corrections to my previous message:

> As for how it's installed, I believe that's handled by the upstream setup.py:
>      data_files=[
>          ("share/bumblebee-status/themes", glob.glob("themes/*.json")),
>          ("share/bumblebee-status/themes/icons", glob.glob("themes/icons/*.json")),
>          ("share/bumblebee-status/utility", glob.glob("bin/*")),
>      ]
> Looks like it's put into /something/share/bumblebee-status/utility.

Confirmed that it's /usr/share/bumblebee-status/utility.

>>   * the build fails here, in a fresh Debian unstable qemu image, with:
>>
>>         ERROR tests/core/test_output.py - RuntimeError: unable to find 
>> theme default
> 
> I am aware of this failure and have reported it upstream. For now, I'll 
> disable the offending test.

After doing that, I discovered that almost all of the tests are faulty 
(at least on Python 3.10), so I've disabled tests altogether for now.

> As far as Debian is concerned, MIT and Expat are the same license > (although in reality MIT is a term used to describe two slightly
> different licenses).
I was corrected by pabs on IRC; Debian does in fact prefer the use of 
the terms Expat and X11 to be separate and not to use the term MIT.
I was used to the way the Rust team does things, which uses MIT.

--
Ben Westover

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 02:10 +0200
  Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 03:20 +0200
    Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 04:30 +0200
      Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 04:50 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
          Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
            Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 16:50 +0200
              Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
                Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 00:50 +0200
                Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 15:30 +0200
              Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
          Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
            Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:10 +0200
        Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 16:30 +0200
          Re: Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 03:30 +0200

csiph-web