Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14142

Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package
Date Tue, 07 Jun 2022 08:20:02 +0200
Message-ID <EvAJk-38p1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <EvuXf-34C0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvuXf-34C0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evw2Z-35cy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evx8J-35Wo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evxs5-3638-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jun 7 06:17:19 2022
Old-Return-Path <wrar@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-12.01 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -3.5
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kvC4FHeiU7ljwwR5"
Content-Disposition inline
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19971
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Yp7tXWCsxztgp5id@belkar.wrar.name
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 44
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:17:01 +0500
X-Original-Message-ID <Yp7tXWCsxztgp5id@belkar.wrar.name>
X-Original-References <87sfohoni3.fsf@curie.anarc.at> <fe867c28-62cc-f02b-0f71-6e4990ed8ac4@gmail.com> <0f84e96b-c0eb-2d0e-fc7e-a8b272549aea@gmail.com> <87fskhb44h.fsf@angela.anarc.at> <367c1fcc-e57e-bde4-61eb-787042586a60@gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14142

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 10:42:53PM -0400, Ben Westover wrote:
> > Does the package *work* at all in 3.10? We might not want to silence
> > real errors here...
> 
> Upstream says 3.4-3.9 is supported, but I don't know if that's because 3.10
> doesn't work or because they haven't bothered to add it. Searching their bug
> tracker, I wasn't able to find any 3.10-related issues yet.
> I also haven't tried to use the program with Python 3.10, because I don't
> use it myself at all (packaging this for a friend).
This is a really bad idea IMO.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 02:10 +0200
  Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 03:20 +0200
    Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 04:30 +0200
      Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 04:50 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
          Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
            Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 16:50 +0200
              Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
                Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 00:50 +0200
                Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 15:30 +0200
              Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
          Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
            Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:10 +0200
        Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 16:30 +0200
          Re: Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 03:30 +0200

csiph-web