Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14385
| Path | csiph.com!pasdenom.info!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose |
| Date | Thu, 25 Aug 2022 20:20:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EYpCp-31Wu-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <EWSSd-24D9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Aug 25 18:10:31 2022 |
| Old-Return-Path | <wrar@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-12.01 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -3.5 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a2mvwQrMiFu7iqKz" |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20223 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Ywe7AYJIAt4+xS6X@belkar.wrar.name |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 39 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Thu, 25 Aug 2022 23:10:09 +0500 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <Ywe7AYJIAt4+xS6X@belkar.wrar.name> |
| X-Original-References | <YwItZCbz6Uw1g7Cz@mitya57.me> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14385 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 04:04:36PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> > dateparser (U) Fixing this now, thanks! Note that in this case nose usage was removed some time ago but the deps remained, some other packages may be similarly trivial to fix. -- WBR, wRAR
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-08-21 15:10 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> - 2022-08-21 15:20 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-08-21 15:20 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> - 2022-08-21 15:40 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-08-21 20:20 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org> - 2022-08-22 09:00 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2022-08-22 13:10 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2022-08-25 20:20 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Jakub Wilk <jwilk@jwilk.net> - 2022-08-26 13:40 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-08-29 14:40 +0200
csiph-web