Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14366
| From | Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel, linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Proposed MBF: packages still using nose |
| Date | 2022-08-21 15:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EWSSd-24D9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi, nose [1] is a testing framework for Python, which is dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3]. The former maintainer of nose recommends projects using nose to switch to nose2 [4], pytest [5] or unittest from Python standard library [6]. There is a script called nose2pytest [7] which can assist with migrating from nose to pytest. nose has a Python 2 code base and it is difficult to keep it in working state for new Python versions. It will probably become impossible after Python 3.13, where lib2to3 will be removed [8]. In Debian sid, we still have 389 packages which either build-depend on nose or use it in autopkgtests. I propose to file bugs for them asking to switch to a supported alternative. A dd-list is attached. [1]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/nose [2]: https://github.com/nose-devs/nose/commit/0f40fa995384afad [3]: https://pypi.org/project/nose/#history [4]: https://docs.nose2.io/en/latest/ [5]: https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/ [6]: https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html [7]: https://github.com/pytest-dev/nose2pytest [8]: https://docs.python.org/3/library/2to3.html#module-lib2to3 -- Dmitry Shachnev
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-08-21 15:10 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> - 2022-08-21 15:20 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-08-21 15:20 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> - 2022-08-21 15:40 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-08-21 20:20 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org> - 2022-08-22 09:00 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2022-08-22 13:10 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2022-08-25 20:20 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Jakub Wilk <jwilk@jwilk.net> - 2022-08-26 13:40 +0200
Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-08-29 14:40 +0200
csiph-web