Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13967

Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?

Path	csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?
Date	Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:30:01 +0100
Message-ID	<DSxYd-2Td5-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<DRT4J-2tgC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DRV6x-2usV-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <DRW2B-2v2M-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DRWci-2vmc-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Feb 19 13:27:08 2022
Old-Return-Path	<andreas@an3as.eu>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.01 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate:hard: -4.6
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition	inline
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19781
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/YhDwHaEAngwAqJF4@an3as.eu
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	38
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:26:53 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<YhDwHaEAngwAqJF4@an3as.eu>
X-Original-References	<CAB4XWXxiJQKo_qKvUZ3n=hGqN=RPO6zQtcGUK5mAPJwKTvo_eA@mail.gmail.com> <Yg6n/lNxNQOSjNNc@an3as.eu> <CAB4XWXwy2A6FVrmNOY-P2E3tc4_vpd3baySRkDGDxB2MwV024Q@mail.gmail.com> <0c4b2fbe-4b96-a454-0630-552f35eac283@riseup.net>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13967

Show key headers only | View raw

Am Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 02:31:13AM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> On 2/18/22 2:23 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > thanks for bringing the perspective of how things are done in the Med
> > team, but it feels none of the points you mentioned nor the specific
> > Med team workflow apply here,
> 
> I suppose the highlight was the usage of routine-update[1] package before upload
> and we could use it with DPT too.

Yes.

> This does similar(same?) changes as in janitor.

I asked Jelmer what Janitor is doing and included those calls into
routine-update.

> But that said, I agree with what you wrote:
> 
> > or are relevant to just let Janitor
> > commit directly to our packages.
> 
> I vote a in for/OK for janitor to commit directly as well.

Just in case this was not clear from my previous mail:  I'm fine with
direct commits.

My additional point was that I consider it sensible to let those commits
follow actual uploads which I was missing for several DPT packages which
I touched by chance.

Kind regards

      Andreas.

> [1]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/routine-update

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Thread

Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-02-17 18:50 +0100
  Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2022-02-17 21:00 +0100
    Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-02-17 22:00 +0100
      Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Nilesh Patra <nilesh@riseup.net> - 2022-02-17 22:10 +0100
        Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2022-02-19 14:30 +0100
  Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-03-29 23:50 +0200
    Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? stefanor@debian.org - 2022-05-24 12:40 +0200
      Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Jelmer Vernooĳ <jelmer@debian.org> - 2022-05-24 12:50 +0200

csiph-web