Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13919
| From | Nilesh Patra <nilesh@tchncs.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x |
| Date | 2022-02-04 17:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DN9jQ-1uv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <DJ559-49h-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <DMSVI-8jv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DN90t-18r-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DJ559-49h-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <DN90t-18r-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 2/4/22 9:18 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Basically, the mistune upstream author has completely messed up on > this by making what is essentially a completely different package with > superficially similar functionality but the same name. True. > [...] > _mistune.py within the Debian package, > and have nbconvert do "import nbconvert.filters._mistune as mistune" > (see /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nbconvert/filters/markdown_mistune.py). > That seems like an eminently sensible solution to this problem. But that'd lead to a number of mistune's embedded copies in a huge number of packages; since majority of the rev-deps (when I last checked) haven't adapted to this new version. When they do, and it becomes a overhead to fix each one later. Even worse, if we discover a security problem sometime later, then all such packages would be effected, and that honestly does not look like a good idea to me. I somehow do not understand the urgency of uploading this newer version, as the maintainer said: | I intend to upload src:mistune 2.0.0 to unstable between March the | 15th and April the 15th (depending on the progress of its | reverse-dependencies). We could simply wait a little more for the dust to settle, IMHO. Regards, Nilesh
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-02-03 23:40 +0100
Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-02-04 17:10 +0100
Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Nilesh Patra <nilesh@tchncs.de> - 2022-02-04 17:30 +0100
Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Jerome Charaoui <jerome@riseup.net> - 2022-02-04 18:40 +0100
Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-02-04 17:10 +0100
Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Nilesh Patra <nilesh@tchncs.de> - 2022-02-04 17:10 +0100
Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-02-04 17:40 +0100
Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-02-05 20:00 +0100
Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Nilesh Patra <nilesh@tchncs.de> - 2022-02-05 20:30 +0100
Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-02-05 23:00 +0100
Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-02-05 23:00 +0100
csiph-web