Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1090655

Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:38:44 +0100 peb@debian.org wrote:
 > Package: python3-schema-salad
 > Severity: wishlist
 >
 > Dear maintainer,
 >
 > Your package python3-schema-salad depends on python3-mistune 0.8.4
 > which is no longer maintained and deprecated in favour of version
 > 2.0.0.
 >
 > As python3-mistune 2.0.0 is not backward compatible, I reverted the
 > upload of it that I did in unstable and python3-mistune 0.8.4 will
 > stay around a bit longer.
 >
 > In the meantime, please try to see if upstream of
 > python3-schema-salad either released a version that is compatible
 > with python3-mistune 2.0.0 or if python3-schema-salad can easily be
 > fixed to support such a version. As soon as you're ready to upload
 > your package please update this bug report and we'll try to
 > coordinate so that I release python3-mistune at a time that is fit
 > for you to also release python3-schema-salad.

Dear Pierre-Elliott Bécue,

Thank you for trying to find a way forward in this mess. I am also the 
upstream maintainer for schema-salad. We have yet to find a way to 
support mistune 2.x

Here is our attempt so far:

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/schema_salad/pull/496/files?short_path=5c6a130#diff-5c6a1301c6b59b30a040d747d065e861d3dd98bde0e5a4356d92d594e9835986

And an issue I opened with mistune directly about a regression in 
multi-line list handling that goes against multiple markdown specs: 
https://github.com/lepture/mistune/issues/296

We have not decided if we will switch to another library, wait for a 
fixed mistune 2.x release, or keep with the older version.

 > I intend to upload src:mistune 2.0.0 to unstable between March the

 > 15th and April the 15th (depending on the progress of its
 > reverse-dependencies). I'll raise the severity of this bug
 > approximately a month before making such an upload.

Since Mistune 2.0.0 regresses its support for standard markdown, I ask 
that a separate package be made for mistune 2.x to give more time for 
mistune 0.8.x users to migrate to mistune 2.x or another library entirely.

Cheers,


-- 
Michael R. Crusoe

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x "Michael R. Crusoe" <crusoe@debian.org> - 2022-01-24 11:50 +0100
  Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-02-03 23:40 +0100
    Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-02-04 17:10 +0100
      Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Nilesh Patra <nilesh@tchncs.de> - 2022-02-04 17:30 +0100
        Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Jerome Charaoui <jerome@riseup.net> - 2022-02-04 18:40 +0100
    Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-02-04 17:10 +0100
      Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Nilesh Patra <nilesh@tchncs.de> - 2022-02-04 17:10 +0100
        Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-02-04 17:40 +0100
        Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-02-05 20:00 +0100
          Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Nilesh Patra <nilesh@tchncs.de> - 2022-02-05 20:30 +0100
            Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-02-05 23:00 +0100
              Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-02-05 23:00 +0100

csiph-web