Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13847

Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report

Path	csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report
Date	Mon, 03 Jan 2022 07:40:01 +0100
Message-ID	<DBpaF-4ZS-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<DnZ4l-3Xw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DtqwV-55n-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DBjRE-1y9-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Jan 3 06:30:26 2022
Old-Return-Path	<debian@kitterman.com>
X-Spam-Flag	NO
X-Spam-Score	-12.2
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-12.2 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -5.5
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2478094.11q3a4yCLP"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19660
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/9507876.bEyJeT16R8@localhost
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	51
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Mon, 03 Jan 2022 01:30:09 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID	<9507876.bEyJeT16R8@localhost>
X-Original-References	<CAB4XWXy2LbjWRdBt1HrJDGfveJfg6hrCd8D9W9L1jOx7sfoTOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAB4XWXyPN-HDLZDZhTc254OBK2Zoeq6Xo5hDV_HpDU=uH=0xkw@mail.gmail.com> <f3374e32-c9cb-73af-2a3e-792f413e47d1@debian.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13847

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Sunday, January 2, 2022 7:50:02 PM EST Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> On 2021-12-12 01 h 23, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> 
> >> I think there's still one point we need to figure out: how to make
> >> these remarks known to the packages maintainers, instead of all of
> >> them just being in a text file.
> > 
> > 
> > This is still an open point, and i welcome ideas
> 
> 
> Is there a reason why we shouldn't just file bugs in the BTS? I get it's
> not the perfect tool for that, but it would certainly help reach the
> maintainers.
> 
> Using a common usertag would also make it easier to find and fix these
> issues en masse ;)

Since this is all about team Git repositories, someone should just fix them 
(modulo the one about using pypi, which I think we mostly agree isn't 
something someone unfamiliar with the package can 'fix').

Scott K

Thread

DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2021-11-27 07:10 +0100
  Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2021-11-27 10:50 +0100
    Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-11-27 12:20 +0100
  Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-11-27 15:00 +0100
    Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2021-11-27 19:20 +0100
    Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2021-12-10 07:40 +0100
      Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2021-12-12 07:30 +0100
        Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-01-03 02:00 +0100
          Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2022-01-03 07:40 +0100
            Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2022-01-03 21:20 +0100
            Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-01-03 21:20 +0100

csiph-web