Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13565

Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED
Date Wed, 22 Sep 2021 00:40:01 +0200
Message-ID <CZWAF-6Ec-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <CZaFH-2HO-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <CZaFH-2HO-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <CZaFH-2HO-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <CZceu-3Oh-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <CZpEJ-3D6-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CZtfk-5SL-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <CZVbA-5Wb-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Sep 21 22:38:20 2021
Old-Return-Path <sandro.tosi@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-6.501 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: .mail-qk1-f171.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5
X-Gm-Message-State AOAM533jpPLcTX6S9KkrfUslfeH7HYqrR7cysO/9COeNhUn2EaUSBVlK IgNe5tHAH+L47eakUTgRKijtyprrNB6txHHCmHKa66GC
X-Google-SMTP-Source ABdhPJyQ6oPs0UOHWUrpHoXI72QSfYTEcqhQYf+eesYCqClrJvK5eg+Y76DN2FaR4gptPFYajP3A+yi4A25PnLd0QFg=
X-Received by 2002:a25:3486:: with SMTP id b128mr14470119yba.138.1632263885318; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19361
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAB4XWXzLAa-GFRXifAz9SUgyh+2UNwPugU5iaOuAcCkmtUU5Sg@mail.gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 45
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:37:39 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID <CAB4XWXzLAa-GFRXifAz9SUgyh+2UNwPugU5iaOuAcCkmtUU5Sg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <E1mRrYl-000B13-7E@fasolo.debian.org> <1f944d96-c152-3a50-a20f-f0c5137493ce@t-online.de> <YUeOdIS59hBeKG61@debian.org> <256be314-dabd-a2cc-1c9e-a2bfaad030a5@t-online.de> <YUhss0iVzC0Z5C4p@debian.org> <CAB4XWXxOJxyjCak-Z-ZET82yakOcGyCiPb9nBT_qSO5qwz=O0w@mail.gmail.com> <YUpH4bykCzU1cbn+@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13565

Show key headers only | View raw


On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 5:00 PM Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 11:14:44AM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > > That's because gbp does not use pristine-tar by default, and
> > > debian/gbp.conf was missing `pristine-tar=True`. Just pushed a commit to
> > > fix that.
> >
> > I dont think this is the right approach: the default options to work
> > on DPT packages should be in gbp default config file (or in another,
> > global, config file), and not live in each and every package
> > debian/gbp.conf file; it is already inconsistently maintained with
> > several packages having uncommon settings that will take precedence
> > over the default ones.
>
> I agree with you in theory; my global gbp.cons enables pristine-tar.
>
> However, having it duplicated in every package means we as a team work
> consistently regardless of people's global configuration,

not at all, right now we dont have a *consistent* debian/gbp.conf in
each package, everyone writes their own and it's currently a mess.

what when we decide to add a new option, or change the value of an
existing one? DPT currently has ~2500 packages: how do you maintain
consistency in all of them?

> and that's one
> less detail people need to get just right to be able to contribute
> effectively.
>
> Also, one's global configuration might not apply to all the packages
> they contribute to; it's easier for everyone if gbp just does the
> right thing based on per-package configuration than expecting people to
> remember to switch their defaults, or to pass options explicitly.

please refer to
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2021/09/msg00065.html for how i
see this being implemented.


--
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2021-09-19 21:30 +0200
  Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de> - 2021-09-19 23:10 +0200
    Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-09-20 09:30 +0200
    Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2021-09-20 13:30 +0200
      Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2021-09-20 17:20 +0200
        Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-09-20 17:30 +0200
          Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2021-09-21 03:20 +0200
        Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-09-20 21:50 +0200
        Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2021-09-21 23:10 +0200
          Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2021-09-22 00:40 +0200
          Re: writing debian/gbp.conf considered harmful [was:  python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED] Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-09-22 09:30 +0200

csiph-web