Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13028

Re: Should Binaries provided by python-babel have a "python3-" prefix?

Path	csiph.com!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: Should Binaries provided by python-babel have a "python3-" prefix?
Date	Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:00:02 +0100
Message-ID	<BfsMG-741-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<BfoJ3-4JH-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Debian Python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Nov 26 16:56:00 2020
Old-Return-Path	<zigo@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.001 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate:hard: -3.5
Organization	Debian
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language	en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18793
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/8f05f0df-d77d-67eb-a80b-a2d1fdb82595@debian.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	43
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:55:45 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<8f05f0df-d77d-67eb-a80b-a2d1fdb82595@debian.org>
X-Original-References	<CAJN1928zRF4svCEGPT9Bs2KWkXnd7Q=4rm+gEXQQrLiwCjTm8g@mail.gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13028

Show key headers only | View raw

On 11/26/20 1:16 PM, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Currently src:python-babel provides 3 binaries:
> 
> * python3-babel
> * python-babel-doc
> * python-babel-localedata
> 
> of which python3-babel is the main binary, -babel-doc is for the
> documentation and -babel-localedata is for storing locale data files
> used by python3-babel.
> 
> Should this be renamed to a "python3-" prefix for both binaries? They do
> not contain any actual code though
> 
> BTW this also has a RC bug, and I pushed the fix to salsa. If it needs a
> renaming, it'd be great if someone could upload it to NEW.
> 
> If not, I'll do a source-only-upload.
> Please let me know what you think of this.
> 
> Kind regards
> Nilesh

Hi,

It used to be that we had a python-babel that also needed the data in
python-babel-localedata, which was shared by both the Python 2 and 3
packages. Now, we don't have it anymore. So probably, what could be
done, is move all the files in python3-babel, and get rid of
python-babel-localedata completely.

python-babel-doc is still the correct package name for the doc (unless
the amount of doc is small and could be integrated in python3-babel as
well).

If that's the way to go, then python3-babel needs a Breaks+Replaces:
python-babel-localedata.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Thread

Should Binaries provided by python-babel have a "python3-" prefix? Nilesh Patra <npatra974@gmail.com> - 2020-11-26 13:40 +0100
  Re: Should Binaries provided by python-babel have a "python3-"  prefix? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2020-11-26 18:00 +0100
  Re: Should Binaries provided by python-babel have a "python3-"  prefix? Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> - 2020-11-26 22:40 +0100
    Re: Should Binaries provided by python-babel have a "python3-"  prefix? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2020-11-27 13:20 +0100
      Re: Should Binaries provided by python-babel have a "python3-"  prefix? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2020-11-27 14:20 +0100

csiph-web