Path: csiph.com!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Thomas Goirand Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Should Binaries provided by python-babel have a "python3-" prefix? Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:00:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Debian Python X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Nov 26 16:56:00 2020 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.001 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -3.5 Organization: Debian User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18793 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/8f05f0df-d77d-67eb-a80b-a2d1fdb82595@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 43 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:55:45 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <8f05f0df-d77d-67eb-a80b-a2d1fdb82595@debian.org> X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13028 On 11/26/20 1:16 PM, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi, > > Currently src:python-babel provides 3 binaries: > > * python3-babel > * python-babel-doc > * python-babel-localedata > > of which python3-babel is the main binary, -babel-doc is for the > documentation and -babel-localedata is for storing locale data files > used by python3-babel. > > Should this be renamed to a "python3-" prefix for both binaries? They do > not contain any actual code though > > BTW this also has a RC bug, and I pushed the fix to salsa. If it needs a > renaming, it'd be great if someone could upload it to NEW. > > If not, I'll do a source-only-upload. > Please let me know what you think of this. > > Kind regards > Nilesh Hi, It used to be that we had a python-babel that also needed the data in python-babel-localedata, which was shared by both the Python 2 and 3 packages. Now, we don't have it anymore. So probably, what could be done, is move all the files in python3-babel, and get rid of python-babel-localedata completely. python-babel-doc is still the correct package name for the doc (unless the amount of doc is small and could be integrated in python3-babel as well). If that's the way to go, then python3-babel needs a Breaks+Replaces: python-babel-localedata. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)