Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13219

Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Bastian Venthur <venthur@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye
Date Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:20:02 +0100
Message-ID <BJ4Gu-1w5-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <BHoJk-6G2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BHulH-1CA-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Feb 16 09:17:41 2021
Old-Return-Path <debian-python@m.gmane-mx.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-2.886 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.105, SARE_MLH_Stock10=1.66] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -4.6
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
Content-Language en-US
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19002
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/s0g2iu$9h1$1@ciao.gmane.io
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 33
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:17:18 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <s0g2iu$9h1$1@ciao.gmane.io>
X-Original-References <20210211181234.GA4829@silverpine> <5c9a9365-20b9-c600-638c-6c74a024779a@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13219

Show key headers only | View raw


On 12.02.21 01:11, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I understand that upstream python guys probably think the way to consume
> python stuff is through venv, pip, and setuptools. I have a very
> different view on this, and probably I'm not alone.
> 
> We (Debian people) indeed prefer if our user can enjoy a packaged
> versions of things if they are available (and that's not specific to
> Python). In such a packaged environment, venv and distutils are useless,
> as the distribution is taking care of all what these tools would do
> without apt or dpkg. I do prefer my system to *not* have venv support,
> for example.


Being a Debian Developer myself, I have to disagree here. I *wish* I 
could just install everything via the Debian Packaging System, but the 
reality for most relevant Python packages is very different: packages 
are either outdated or do not exist in Debian -- heck, even PIP is 
outdated in a way that you actually have to `pip install -U pip` in 
order to use it properly due to the recent manylinux change.

So at work, were we use Python, we basically use only Debian's minimal 
image and install a naked Python + pip. Then we upgrade pip to make it 
usable and then install every python package via pip.


Cheers,

Bastian


-- 
Dr. Bastian Venthur                                 https://venthur.de
Debian Developer                                 venthur at debian org

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Elana Hashman <ehashman@debian.org> - 2021-02-11 19:20 +0100
  Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-11 19:30 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 05:30 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 17:30 +0100
  Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 01:20 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye stefanor@debian.org - 2021-02-12 01:50 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 09:20 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 09:40 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 10:20 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 11:30 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 13:20 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Julien Palard <julien@palard.fr> - 2021-02-12 14:10 +0100
              Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 17:40 +0100
              Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-13 23:10 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 21:20 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 21:00 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Michael Kesper <mkesper@schokokeks.org> - 2021-02-12 21:50 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Tristan Seligmann <mithrandi@mithrandi.net> - 2021-02-12 10:30 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 10:50 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 11:40 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 12:10 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 15:20 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 17:00 +0100
              Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 17:20 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Michael Kesper <mkesper@schokokeks.org> - 2021-02-12 11:00 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-02-12 18:00 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Bastian Venthur <venthur@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 10:20 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 19:30 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-02-16 20:20 +0100
      Python package situation Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 21:50 +0100
        Re: Python package situation Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 22:20 +0100
          Re: Python package situation Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 23:20 +0100
          Re: Python package situation Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2021-02-17 02:10 +0100
            Re: Python package situation Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-02-17 08:00 +0100
            Re: Python package situation Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2021-02-17 10:30 +0100

csiph-web