Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13202

Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Michael Kesper <mkesper@schokokeks.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye
Date Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:00:01 +0100
Message-ID <BHDoZ-6SP-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <BHoJk-6G2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BHulH-1CA-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Feb 12 09:58:04 2021
Old-Return-Path <mkesper@schokokeks.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-10.143 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DIGITS_LETTERS=1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.105, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SARE_MLH_Stock10=1.66] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -4.6
X-Greylist delayed 305 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:57:52 UTC
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_zucker.schokokeks.org-27874-1613123565-0001-2"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18985
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/898d6952-7cfb-5395-d681-b60018ec602a@schokokeks.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 83
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:52:37 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <898d6952-7cfb-5395-d681-b60018ec602a@schokokeks.org>
X-Original-References <20210211181234.GA4829@silverpine> <5c9a9365-20b9-c600-638c-6c74a024779a@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13202

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi all,

Am 12.02.21 um 01:11 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
> Hi Elana,
> 
> Thanks for bringing this topic in the channel, and speaking with the
> Python Steering Council, plus Mathias and Stefano. That's very much
> appreciated.
> 
> On 2/11/21 7:12 PM, Elana Hashman wrote:
>> - When users install Python, it should be easy to install all required
>>   modules for what upstream considers core, including venv, distutils,
>>   and lib2to3.
> 
> I understand that upstream python guys probably think the way to consume
> python stuff is through venv, pip, and setuptools. I have a very
> different view on this, and probably I'm not alone.
> 
> We (Debian people) indeed prefer if our user can enjoy a packaged
> versions of things if they are available (and that's not specific to
> Python). In such a packaged environment, venv and distutils are useless,
> as the distribution is taking care of all what these tools would do
> without apt or dpkg. I do prefer my system to *not* have venv support,
> for example.

This seems to be in contrast to how Python gets used by many many people.
I think it would be nice if up to date packages of all Python software
would exist in Debian but that's clearly not feasible.
Using virtualenvs is expected virtually everywhere where Python is mentioned.

My 2 cents
Michael

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Elana Hashman <ehashman@debian.org> - 2021-02-11 19:20 +0100
  Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-11 19:30 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 05:30 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 17:30 +0100
  Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 01:20 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye stefanor@debian.org - 2021-02-12 01:50 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 09:20 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 09:40 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 10:20 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 11:30 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 13:20 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Julien Palard <julien@palard.fr> - 2021-02-12 14:10 +0100
              Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 17:40 +0100
              Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-13 23:10 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 21:20 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 21:00 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Michael Kesper <mkesper@schokokeks.org> - 2021-02-12 21:50 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Tristan Seligmann <mithrandi@mithrandi.net> - 2021-02-12 10:30 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 10:50 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 11:40 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 12:10 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 15:20 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 17:00 +0100
              Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 17:20 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Michael Kesper <mkesper@schokokeks.org> - 2021-02-12 11:00 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-02-12 18:00 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Bastian Venthur <venthur@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 10:20 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 19:30 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-02-16 20:20 +0100
      Python package situation Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 21:50 +0100
        Re: Python package situation Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 22:20 +0100
          Re: Python package situation Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 23:20 +0100
          Re: Python package situation Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2021-02-17 02:10 +0100
            Re: Python package situation Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-02-17 08:00 +0100
            Re: Python package situation Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2021-02-17 10:30 +0100

csiph-web