Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12995

Re: Package naming advice: python3-pyls-jsonrpc or python3-jsonrpc-server?

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Package naming advice: python3-pyls-jsonrpc or python3-jsonrpc-server?
Date Sun, 01 Nov 2020 19:00:02 +0100
Message-ID <B6pO2-1a9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <B6puF-13o-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Nov 1 17:53:14 2020
Old-Return-Path <jspricke@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-12 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .debian. - helo: .smtprelay08.ispgateway. - helo-domain: .ispgateway.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -3.5
X-Greylist delayed 475 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 17:53:02 UTC
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7"
Content-Disposition inline
Organization The Debian Project
X-Df-Sender NTc3MDAz
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18759
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20201101174503.GA5423@vis.fritz.box
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 44
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python@lists.debian.org, Pablo Mestre <pmdcuba@gmail.com>, Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>
X-Original-Date Sun, 1 Nov 2020 18:45:03 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <20201101174503.GA5423@vis.fritz.box>
X-Original-References <CAHj_TLAqLv-spPDirZrYxD+36+nXxmSpv0N0k7F3D_NmiQrNCA@mail.gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:12995

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Otto,

* Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org> [2020-11-01 19:36]:
>Upstream uses 'python-jsonrpc-server' as the repository and also the
>pip package name. Should we follow that in Debian or perhaps use the
>alternative name 'python3-pyls-jsonrpc'?
>
>Is there some existing naming convention/policy about Python modules
>of this sort?

https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/module_packages.html#package_names

So python3-pyls-jsonrpc for the binary package is correct.

Cheers Jochen

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Package naming advice: python3-pyls-jsonrpc or python3-jsonrpc-server? Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org> - 2020-11-01 18:40 +0100
  Re: Package naming advice: python3-pyls-jsonrpc or  python3-jsonrpc-server? Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org> - 2020-11-01 19:00 +0100
  Re: Package naming advice: python3-pyls-jsonrpc or  python3-jsonrpc-server? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2020-11-01 19:40 +0100
    Re: Package naming advice: python3-pyls-jsonrpc or python3-jsonrpc-server? Otto Kekäläinen <otto@seravo.fi> - 2020-11-01 20:10 +0100

csiph-web