Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Jochen Sprickerhof Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Package naming advice: python3-pyls-jsonrpc or python3-jsonrpc-server? Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 19:00:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Otto =?utf-8?B?S2Vrw6Rsw6RpbmVu?= X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Nov 1 17:53:14 2020 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-12 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .debian. - helo: .smtprelay08.ispgateway. - helo-domain: .ispgateway.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -3.5 X-Greylist: delayed 475 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 17:53:02 UTC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline Organization: The Debian Project X-Df-Sender: NTc3MDAz X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18759 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20201101174503.GA5423@vis.fritz.box Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 44 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org, Pablo Mestre , Boyuan Yang X-Original-Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 18:45:03 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <20201101174503.GA5423@vis.fritz.box> X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:12995 --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Otto, * Otto Kek=C3=A4l=C3=A4inen [2020-11-01 19:36]: >Upstream uses 'python-jsonrpc-server' as the repository and also the >pip package name. Should we follow that in Debian or perhaps use the >alternative name 'python3-pyls-jsonrpc'? > >Is there some existing naming convention/policy about Python modules >of this sort? https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/module_packages.= html#package_names So python3-pyls-jsonrpc for the binary package is correct. Cheers Jochen --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEc7KZy9TurdzAF+h6W//cwljmlDMFAl+e9BoACgkQW//cwljm lDNkERAAlRmKL77Hc2kJRoWQHm/cBShNz21Mj8q96KLeon62A+LzTpRmynOjumD+ 2vj1Vpx7LLfylsyGT9cMPpfznZ8tkdQlQgqn8NoQYfHBXgcEuSRSXej5xM8tWJ3z yDr68stAthIHlC4Vb8i5GYdc0yno2LfDtCx6xqj1xSa2e/yzO7CQMxa3ijvcd8ae rMSejiV1CbWEd+Sr6cQFO1lq4whpBDVS+aiFTaJ3ixhkNZVAEYMyAwF9DnXwWYJA UDDYSQLzPbHmA2npJ5xpMnBCr7M1cfnBZXPgEjQD/OvzzzxaKpaoBvmF4QPJEIjt M7mzVpaYUShGP2uMdU7LlYvbpEE5At1WSNtpbipY5x7cAOq+cmlj96p3tcVuYQo1 T0EHdYgTxFEvCdvU4CUjuUuDKCLOlvqVlpzYiiYPd3B5kT8uBBskkhT5bVhxHquD laZEt4dEYpC/6/FaKGC9NCyh//yBJKzrB2ZwINI5Jq+eMQeZTTyn7SXKNNijCpR8 x9twgQkV59Vtbu31UdkNkE26nK1nTuU8WbFU8+ZsOX7jDvdm6yXZaEfXM5WcprxB WJYMSkb/Al8LRJTFEJyPI6U8+R5izML+oyphD5WusLSHNjw1/kNnA5bWVKUkQ9F/ 2ndE8LKSKppbgoAjvMpaoaPFZKMW0eMeJz2fPRN6FqF8VKHg82Y= =2A9Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--