Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12969
| From | Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye |
| Date | 2020-10-27 00:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <B4kfM-4bm-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <B1dXb-5Tw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Debian |
On 10/18/20 12:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Python 3.9 as a supported Python3 version is now in unstable, and all binNMUs
> are done (thanks to Graham for the work). Bug reports should be all filed for
> all known problems [1], and the current state of the 3.9 addition can be seen at
> [2] (a few of the "bad" are false packages with b-d n python3-all-dev, but not
> building for 3.9, bug reports also filed).
>
> The major outstanding issue is the pandas stack, all other problems are found in
> leaf packages (leaf in the sense of that no other package for the 3.9 addition
> is blocked).
>
> Please help fixing the remaining issues!
>
> Matthias
Hi Matthias,
I don't know if that was on purpose, but you happen to upload Python 3.9
in Unstable the day OpenStack was released. I then rebuilt all of
OpenStack to upload from Experimental to Unstable, and to my surprise,
it went very well (note: all packages in the OpenStack team are running
unit tests at build time on all available Python versions). Only 2
issues happened multiple times:
- base64.{en,de}codestring removal (easy fix: s/string/bytes/)
- Threading.isAlive removal (easy fix too: s/isAlive/is_alive/)
This happened
This is on a set of 200+ packages which I manually rebuilt.
I do expect that there will be more packages with the same issue, so
it'd be nice to have all Python-using packages rebuilt. As Lucas
Nussbaum proposed such a service, should we ask him to do such a massive
rebuilt? Or maybe you have other plans?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Python 3.9 for bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-10-18 12:20 +0200
Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-10-23 13:10 +0200
Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-10-28 19:40 +0100
Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-11-09 10:30 +0100
Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2020-11-09 14:10 +0100
Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye Utkarsh Gupta <guptautkarsh2102@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 14:20 +0100
Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> - 2020-11-11 03:50 +0100
Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-11-13 13:30 +0100
Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-12-06 17:00 +0100
Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2020-10-27 00:40 +0100
csiph-web